PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIWTX vs. MLLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIWTX vs. MLLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2020 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWTX) and MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWTX achieves a 5.46% return, which is significantly higher than MLLIX's 3.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FIWTX has outperformed MLLIX with an annualized return of 6.93%, while MLLIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.91% annualized return.


FIWTX

1D
0.51%
1M
0.00%
6M
3.86%
YTD
5.46%
1Y
10.98%
3Y*
10.54%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
6.93%
ALL TIME*
6.55%

MLLIX

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.08%
6M
2.51%
YTD
3.73%
1Y
7.22%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
4.91%
ALL TIME*
5.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIWTX vs. MLLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIWTX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2020 Fund Institutional Premium Class
5.46%13.40%7.73%12.72%-15.86%8.40%12.75%18.25%-3.86%13.95%
MLLIX
MFS Lifetime Income Fund
3.73%9.32%5.62%9.12%-11.99%6.63%10.06%13.91%-2.37%8.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWTX and MLLIX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.91

The correlation between FIWTX and MLLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIWTX vs. MLLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIWTX
FIWTX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FIWTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MLLIX
MLLIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MLLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MLLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIWTX vs. MLLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2020 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWTX) and MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIWTXMLLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.01

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

8.83

+0.70

FIWTX vs. MLLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the MLLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWTX and MLLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIWTX vs. MLLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWTX drawdown since its inception was -21.59%, which is greater than MLLIX's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWTX and MLLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWTXMLLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.59%

-17.32%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-3.86%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.83%

-4.93%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.59%

-16.08%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.59%

-16.08%

-5.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.40%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.62%

-2.14%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

0.88%

+0.36%

Volatility

FIWTX vs. MLLIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2020 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWTX) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) at 1.11%. This indicates that FIWTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWTXMLLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

1.11%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.80%

3.67%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.87%

4.52%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.65%

5.95%

+2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.79%

5.71%

+3.08%

FIWTX vs. MLLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWTX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than MLLIX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIWTX vs. MLLIX - Dividend Comparison

FIWTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, less than MLLIX's 7.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIWTX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2020 Fund Institutional Premium Class
5.87%6.00%5.88%2.47%3.00%2.77%2.57%17.46%2.56%1.89%1.90%1.79%
MLLIX
MFS Lifetime Income Fund
7.41%6.01%6.26%3.70%3.92%6.12%3.18%3.80%4.20%3.56%4.21%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIWTX and MLLIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIWTX has higher volatility (1.97%) compared to MLLIX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWTX dropped -21.59% vs MLLIX's -17.32%.

FIWTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIWTX and MLLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer