FIVPX vs. LIAGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FIVPX (Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class M) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FIVPX returned 13.21%/yr vs 6.35%/yr for LIAGX. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FIVPX charges 1.55%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.

Performance

FIVPX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class M (FIVPX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVPX achieves a 11.02% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 16.95% return.

FIVPX

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: 2.48%
• 6M: 5.72%
• YTD: 11.02%
• 1Y: 26.88%
• 3Y*: 20.14%
• 5Y*: 13.21%
• 10Y*: 9.37%
• ALL TIME*: 4.39%

LIAGX

• 1D: 4.37%
• 1M: -6.12%
• 6M: 8.48%
• YTD: 16.95%
• 1Y: 27.83%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 6.35%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIVPX Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FIVPX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FIVPX Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class M	11.02%	42.79%	4.36%	18.49%	-8.40%	3.47%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	16.95%	25.09%	9.43%	15.73%	-26.63%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVPX and LIAGX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021	0.82

The correlation between FIVPX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIVPX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIVPX

FIVPX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FIVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FIVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FIVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FIVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FIVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

LIAGX

LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIVPX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class M (FIVPX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIVPX	LIAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.01	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	1.49	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.20	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	1.60	+0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.96	5.36	+3.60

FIVPX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVPX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIVPX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVPX drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than LIAGX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVPX and LIAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIVPX	LIAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.48%	-37.87%	-27.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.42%	-16.02%	+5.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.45%	-17.11%	+2.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.74%	-37.87%	+10.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-12.35%	+12.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.81%	-13.02%	-5.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	4.76%	-1.90%

Volatility

FIVPX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class M (FIVPX) is 4.36%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that FIVPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIVPX	LIAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	9.28%	-4.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.68%	22.99%	-10.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.02%	25.26%	-10.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.51%	19.80%	-3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.61%	19.68%	-2.07%

FIVPX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVPX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIVPX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

FIVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than LIAGX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIVPX Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class M	1.71%	1.89%	1.63%	1.55%	1.38%	3.76%	1.28%	2.88%	2.52%	0.15%	1.98%	0.76%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	0.32%	0.38%	0.48%	0.71%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIVPX and LIAGX in my portfolio?

FIVPX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIVPX or LIAGX?

LIAGX has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to FIVPX (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVPX dropped -65.48% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIVPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.