FIVMX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A (FIVMX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FIVMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 18, 2006. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FIVMX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIVMX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVMX Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A | -1.63% | 43.16% | 4.57% | 18.83% | -8.19% | 14.59% | 2.96% | 18.46% | -17.44% | 17.95% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIVMX achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FIVMX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 8.54%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
FIVMX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- 1Y
- 23.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.39%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIVMX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIVMX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIVMX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FIVMX
FSKAX
FIVMX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A (FIVMX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIVMX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.83 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 1.29 | +0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.19 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.04 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.22 | 5.05 | +2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIVMX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.83 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.59 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.72 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.78 | -0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIVMX and FSKAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIVMX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FIVMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVMX Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A | 2.20% | 2.17% | 1.95% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 4.10% | 1.47% | 3.18% | 2.92% | 0.15% | 2.30% | 1.09% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FIVMX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVMX drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVMX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIVMX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.61% | -35.01% | -29.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.65% | -12.42% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.56% | -25.39% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.79% | -35.01% | -8.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.33% | -8.92% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.15% | -4.05% | -13.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 2.57% | +0.37% |
Volatility
FIVMX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A (FIVMX) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 4.42%. This indicates that FIVMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIVMX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.06% | 4.42% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.58% | 9.40% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.29% | 18.50% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 17.38% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 18.42% | -0.56% |