PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVMX vs. FAOSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIVMX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A (FIVMX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FIVMX

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.14%
YTD
6.59%
6M
10.89%
1Y
21.78%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
9.00%

FAOSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-2.18%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVMX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIVMX
Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A
6.59%43.16%4.57%18.83%-8.19%14.59%2.96%18.46%-17.44%15.12%
FAOSX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z
0.00%15.36%5.06%20.52%-24.31%19.42%15.17%27.96%-14.73%26.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVMX and FAOSX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between FIVMX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVMX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVMX
FIVMX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FIVMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FAOSX
FAOSX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FAOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVMX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A (FIVMX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIVMXFAOSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

-0.18

+1.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

-0.18

+2.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.97

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

1.25

+1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.33

2.29

+6.04

FIVMX vs. FAOSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the FAOSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVMX and FAOSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIVMXFAOSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

-0.18

+1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.23

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.50

-0.27

Drawdowns

FIVMX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVMX drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, which is greater than FAOSX's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVMX and FAOSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVMXFAOSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.61%

-36.24%

-28.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-7.26%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.55%

-13.96%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.56%

-36.24%

+8.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-5.86%

+4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.03%

-7.93%

-9.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

3.95%

-1.14%

Volatility

FIVMX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A (FIVMX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FIVMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVMXFAOSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

0.00%

+4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

4.08%

+7.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

9.20%

+5.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

16.72%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.93%

16.68%

+1.25%

FIVMX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVMX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIVMX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison

FIVMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAOSX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z
8.67%8.67%1.80%1.12%0.85%2.07%0.00%1.70%5.30%3.93%0.00%0.00%
FIVMX
Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A
2.03%2.17%1.95%1.81%1.63%4.10%1.47%3.18%2.92%0.15%2.30%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIVMX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIVMX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVMX dropped -64.61% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.

FIVMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVMX and FAOSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer