FIVE vs. INBX
FIVE (Five Below, Inc.) and INBX (Inhibrx, Inc.) are both stocks. FIVE operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while INBX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past year, FIVE returned 46.44% vs 540.30% for INBX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FIVE vs. INBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIVE achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than INBX's 12.82% return.
FIVE
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -16.42%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- 46.44%
- 3Y*
- 0.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
INBX
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -33.66%
- YTD
- 12.82%
- 6M
- -4.68%
- 1Y
- 540.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIVE vs. INBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FIVE Five Below, Inc. | -0.99% | 79.46% | -20.30% |
INBX Inhibrx, Inc. | 12.82% | 412.99% | 10.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIVE and INBX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2024 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
FIVE:
$10.37B
INBX:
$1.39B
FIVE:
$7.93
INBX:
-$8.40
FIVE:
2.04
INBX:
1.06K
FIVE:
$5.08B
INBX:
$1.30M
FIVE:
$1.77B
INBX:
-$508.00K
FIVE:
$757.48M
INBX:
-$117.63M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIVE vs. INBX — Risk / Return Rank
FIVE
INBX
FIVE vs. INBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) and Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIVE | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.67 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 14.10 | -12.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.48 | 36.07 | -27.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIVE | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 4.21 | -3.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 1.51 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
FIVE vs. INBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVE drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than INBX's maximum drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVE and INBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIVE | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -39.84% | -36.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.71% | -38.66% | +13.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.71% | -37.16% | +12.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.20% | -16.96% | -6.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 15.08% | -9.58% |
Volatility
FIVE vs. INBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) is 18.13%, while Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX) has a volatility of 26.07%. This indicates that FIVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIVE | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.13% | 26.07% | -7.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.44% | 62.17% | -32.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.05% | 129.72% | -90.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.93% | 100.66% | -52.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.13% | 100.66% | -54.53% |
Dividends
FIVE vs. INBX - Dividend Comparison
Neither FIVE nor INBX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FIVE vs. INBX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Five Below, Inc. and Inhibrx, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FIVE and INBX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INBX has higher volatility (26.07%) compared to FIVE (18.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVE dropped -76.40% vs INBX's -39.84%.
INBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.21 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIVE and INBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer