PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITMX vs. QFVOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FITMX vs. QFVOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI International Momentum Index Fund (FITMX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITMX achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly lower than QFVOX's 19.24% return.


FITMX

1D
4.11%
1M
-0.39%
6M
5.13%
YTD
11.68%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.64%

QFVOX

1D
1.07%
1M
2.04%
6M
10.51%
YTD
19.24%
1Y
37.45%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
10.30%
ALL TIME*
7.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FITMX vs. QFVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FITMX
Fidelity SAI International Momentum Index Fund
11.68%36.56%8.97%21.03%-21.45%12.88%31.10%
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
19.24%33.85%-0.70%19.88%-17.14%19.44%42.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FITMX and QFVOX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.64

The correlation between FITMX and QFVOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FITMX vs. QFVOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FITMX
FITMX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FITMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FITMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

QFVOX
QFVOX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QFVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QFVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FITMX vs. QFVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI International Momentum Index Fund (FITMX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FITMXQFVOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.43

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.23

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.73

11.47

-4.75

FITMX vs. QFVOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the QFVOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITMX and QFVOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FITMX vs. QFVOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITMX drawdown since its inception was -34.28%, smaller than the maximum QFVOX drawdown of -70.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITMX and QFVOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FITMXQFVOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.28%

-70.51%

+36.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-11.02%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.10%

-14.92%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.28%

-32.90%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.80%

-0.18%

-3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-15.22%

+8.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

3.11%

+0.45%

Volatility

FITMX vs. QFVOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI International Momentum Index Fund (FITMX) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX) at 4.22%. This indicates that FITMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QFVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FITMXQFVOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

4.22%

+2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

13.83%

+4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.78%

15.43%

+4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.15%

15.58%

+2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

16.37%

+1.30%

FITMX vs. QFVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITMX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QFVOX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FITMX vs. QFVOX - Dividend Comparison

FITMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than QFVOX's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FITMX
Fidelity SAI International Momentum Index Fund
2.34%2.62%3.50%3.39%2.42%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
4.74%5.66%1.95%1.88%1.43%10.11%1.58%1.14%0.98%0.60%1.02%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


FITMX and QFVOX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FITMX has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to QFVOX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITMX dropped -34.28% vs QFVOX's -70.51%.

QFVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FITMX and QFVOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer