FITMX vs. QFVOX
FITMX (Fidelity SAI International Momentum Index Fund) and QFVOX (Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FITMX returned 10.61%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for QFVOX. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FITMX charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for QFVOX.
Performance
FITMX vs. QFVOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FITMX achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly lower than QFVOX's 19.24% return.
FITMX
- 1D
- 4.11%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 11.68%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.64%
QFVOX
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- YTD
- 19.24%
- 1Y
- 37.45%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FITMX vs. QFVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITMX Fidelity SAI International Momentum Index Fund | 11.68% | 36.56% | 8.97% | 21.03% | -21.45% | 12.88% | 31.10% |
QFVOX Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund | 19.24% | 33.85% | -0.70% | 19.88% | -17.14% | 19.44% | 42.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between FITMX and QFVOX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between FITMX and QFVOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FITMX vs. QFVOX — Risk / Return Rank
FITMX
QFVOX
FITMX vs. QFVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI International Momentum Index Fund (FITMX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FITMX | QFVOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.43 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 3.23 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.73 | 11.47 | -4.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FITMX vs. QFVOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITMX drawdown since its inception was -34.28%, smaller than the maximum QFVOX drawdown of -70.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITMX and QFVOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITMX | QFVOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.28% | -70.51% | +36.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | -11.02% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.10% | -14.92% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.28% | -32.90% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | -0.18% | -3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -15.22% | +8.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 3.11% | +0.45% |
Volatility
FITMX vs. QFVOX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity SAI International Momentum Index Fund (FITMX) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX) at 4.22%. This indicates that FITMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QFVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FITMX | QFVOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 4.22% | +2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.91% | 13.83% | +4.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.78% | 15.43% | +4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 15.58% | +2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 16.37% | +1.30% |
FITMX vs. QFVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITMX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QFVOX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FITMX vs. QFVOX - Dividend Comparison
FITMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than QFVOX's 4.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITMX Fidelity SAI International Momentum Index Fund | 2.34% | 2.62% | 3.50% | 3.39% | 2.42% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QFVOX Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund | 4.74% | 5.66% | 1.95% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 10.11% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 0.98% | 0.60% | 1.02% | 1.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FITMX and QFVOX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FITMX has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to QFVOX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITMX dropped -34.28% vs QFVOX's -70.51%.
QFVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FITMX and QFVOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer