FITFX vs. SFNNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX).
FITFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 9, 2017. SFNNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Apr 1, 2007.
Performance
FITFX vs. SFNNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FITFX vs. SFNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITFX Fidelity Flex International Index Fund | 2.15% | 33.21% | 5.37% | 15.45% | -15.72% | 7.76% | 10.77% | 21.44% | -13.97% | 21.09% |
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund | 7.49% | 41.06% | 2.27% | 19.88% | -7.95% | 14.38% | 4.35% | 18.09% | -13.96% | 19.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FITFX achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than SFNNX's 7.49% return.
FITFX
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- -6.91%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 6.52%
- 1Y
- 27.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.46%
- 10Y*
- —
SFNNX
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -6.45%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- 39.13%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FITFX vs. SFNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SFNNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FITFX vs. SFNNX — Risk / Return Rank
FITFX
SFNNX
FITFX vs. SFNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FITFX | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.73 | 2.40 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 3.03 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.47 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.47 | -1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | 13.20 | -4.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FITFX | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.40 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.80 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.25 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between FITFX and SFNNX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FITFX vs. SFNNX - Dividend Comparison
FITFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than SFNNX's 4.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITFX Fidelity Flex International Index Fund | 2.82% | 2.88% | 2.77% | 2.67% | 2.60% | 2.25% | 1.50% | 2.54% | 1.92% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund | 4.76% | 5.11% | 3.61% | 3.26% | 2.92% | 3.81% | 2.42% | 3.69% | 3.51% | 2.70% | 3.21% | 2.92% |
Drawdowns
FITFX vs. SFNNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITFX drawdown since its inception was -34.84%, smaller than the maximum SFNNX drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITFX and SFNNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITFX | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.84% | -59.60% | +24.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.22% | -10.96% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.74% | -25.66% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | -7.73% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.54% | -12.06% | +4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.88% | +0.03% |
Volatility
FITFX vs. SFNNX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) at 7.48%. This indicates that FITFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FITFX | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.98% | 7.48% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 10.99% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 16.49% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 15.46% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 17.28% | -0.97% |