FISR vs. DIA
FISR (SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF) and DIA (State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - FISR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by State Street, while DIA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. FISR is actively managed, while DIA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FISR returned -0.78%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for DIA. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FISR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for DIA.
Performance
FISR vs. DIA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FISR achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than DIA's 6.26% return.
FISR
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.27%
- 5Y*
- -0.78%
- 10Y*
- —
DIA
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- 21.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
FISR vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISR SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF | -0.13% | 6.32% | 1.01% | 5.28% | -15.73% | -1.70% | 5.86% | 6.81% |
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 6.26% | 14.71% | 14.82% | 16.02% | -7.02% | 20.83% | 9.59% | 10.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FISR and DIA is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2019 | 0.13 |
The correlation between FISR and DIA shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FISR vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FISR
DIA
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FISR
DIA
Basic Materials
FISR
-
DIA
Communication Services
FISR
-
DIA
Consumer Cyclical
FISR
-
DIA
Consumer Defensive
FISR
-
DIA
Energy
FISR
-
DIA
Healthcare
FISR
-
DIA
Industrials
FISR
-
DIA
Real Estate
FISR
-
DIA
-
Technology
FISR
-
DIA
Utilities
FISR
-
DIA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FISR vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank
FISR
DIA
FISR vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FISR | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.31 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 2.18 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.53 | 8.42 | -3.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FISR | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.76 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.66 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.49 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
FISR vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FISR drawdown since its inception was -20.27%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISR and DIA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FISR | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.27% | -51.87% | +31.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -9.76% | +6.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.60% | -15.95% | +9.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.10% | -20.76% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | -1.13% | -5.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -7.14% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 2.52% | -1.47% |
Volatility
FISR vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) is 1.44%, while State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that FISR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FISR | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 2.97% | -1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.22% | 9.28% | -6.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36% | 12.10% | -7.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.59% | 14.78% | -8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.35% | 17.53% | -11.18% |
FISR vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FISR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
FISR vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison
FISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than DIA's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 1.38% | 1.43% | 1.61% | 1.81% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 1.85% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 2.33% |
FISR SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF | 4.19% | 3.97% | 3.59% | 3.50% | 2.19% | 1.87% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FISR and DIA have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIA has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to FISR (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISR dropped -20.27% vs DIA's -51.87%.
On 5-year performance, DIA leads with 9.76% vs -0.78% for FISR. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, FISR has been the lower-risk option at 1.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIA has performed better with a 9.76% return vs -0.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FISR.
FISR has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 1.38% for DIA.
FISR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FISR and 0.16% for DIA.
DIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FISR and DIA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer