PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISR vs. DIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FISR vs. DIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISR achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than DIA's 6.26% return.


FISR

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
-0.33%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
3.27%
5Y*
-0.78%
10Y*

DIA

1D
-1.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
6.26%
6M
6.75%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
13.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISR vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FISR
SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF
-0.13%6.32%1.01%5.28%-15.73%-1.70%5.86%6.81%
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
6.26%14.71%14.82%16.02%-7.02%20.83%9.59%10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FISR and DIA is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2019

0.13

The correlation between FISR and DIA shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FISR vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FISR
DIA

Financial Services

100.0%
27.2%

Basic Materials

-

4.0%

Communication Services

-

1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.4%

Energy

-

2.4%

Healthcare

-

13.1%

Industrials

-

18.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

17.1%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FISR
100.0%
DIA
27.2%

Basic Materials

FISR

-

DIA
4.0%

Communication Services

FISR

-

DIA
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FISR

-

DIA
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

FISR

-

DIA
4.4%

Energy

FISR

-

DIA
2.4%

Healthcare

FISR

-

DIA
13.1%

Industrials

FISR

-

DIA
18.4%

Real Estate

FISR

-

DIA

-

Technology

FISR

-

DIA
17.1%

Utilities

FISR

-

DIA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISR vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISR
FISR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FISR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISR Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FISR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

DIA
DIA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISR vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FISRDIADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.18

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.53

8.42

-3.89

FISR vs. DIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISR Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the DIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISR and DIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FISRDIADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.76

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.66

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.49

-0.37

Drawdowns

FISR vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISR drawdown since its inception was -20.27%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISR and DIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISRDIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.27%

-51.87%

+31.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-9.76%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.60%

-15.95%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.10%

-20.76%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.48%

-1.13%

-5.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.70%

-7.14%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

2.52%

-1.47%

Volatility

FISR vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) is 1.44%, while State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that FISR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISRDIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

2.97%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

9.28%

-6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.36%

12.10%

-7.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.59%

14.78%

-8.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.35%

17.53%

-11.18%

FISR vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FISR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

FISR vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison

FISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than DIA's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
1.38%1.43%1.61%1.81%1.91%1.58%1.87%1.85%2.24%1.97%2.26%2.33%
FISR
SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF
4.19%3.97%3.59%3.50%2.19%1.87%2.47%2.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FISR and DIA have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIA has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to FISR (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISR dropped -20.27% vs DIA's -51.87%.

On 5-year performance, DIA leads with 9.76% vs -0.78% for FISR. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, FISR has been the lower-risk option at 1.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIA has performed better with a 9.76% return vs -0.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FISR.

FISR has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 1.38% for DIA.

FISR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FISR and 0.16% for DIA.

DIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FISR and DIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer