FISR vs. DBC
FISR (SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FISR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by State Street, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. FISR is actively managed, while DBC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FISR returned -1.05%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for DBC. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. FISR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
FISR vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FISR achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 27.28% return.
FISR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.30%
- 5Y*
- -1.05%
- 10Y*
- —
DBC
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 22.67%
- YTD
- 27.28%
- 1Y
- 31.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
FISR vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISR SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF | 0.14% | 6.32% | 1.01% | 5.28% | -15.73% | -1.70% | 5.86% | 6.74% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 27.28% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FISR and DBC is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2019 | -0.07 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FISR and DBC has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.37, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FISR vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
FISR
DBC
FISR vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FISR | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.29 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.94 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | 6.62 | -2.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FISR vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FISR drawdown since its inception was -20.27%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISR and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FISR | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.27% | -76.36% | +56.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -16.54% | +13.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.60% | -16.54% | +9.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.10% | -27.34% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.23% | -26.37% | +20.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -46.12% | +38.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 4.82% | -3.66% |
Volatility
FISR vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) is 1.19%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that FISR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FISR | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 6.03% | -4.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.48% | 16.71% | -13.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.32% | 18.85% | -14.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.60% | 19.29% | -12.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.33% | 17.80% | -11.47% |
FISR vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FISR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FISR vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
FISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than DBC's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.61% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
FISR SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF | 4.25% | 3.97% | 3.59% | 3.50% | 2.19% | 1.87% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FISR and DBC have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to FISR (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISR dropped -20.27% vs DBC's -76.36%.
On 5-year performance, DBC leads with 11.45% vs -1.05% for FISR. On fees, FISR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FISR has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBC has performed better with a 11.45% return vs -1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FISR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
FISR has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 2.61% for DBC.
FISR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while DBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FISR and 0.85% for DBC.
DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FISR and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer