PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISNX vs. PHTJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FISNX vs. PHTJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund (FISNX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISNX achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than PHTJX's 8.12% return.


FISNX

1D
0.28%
1M
2.07%
YTD
5.70%
6M
6.03%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
9.44%
5Y*
4.06%
10Y*

PHTJX

1D
0.36%
1M
3.84%
YTD
8.12%
6M
8.45%
1Y
20.49%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISNX vs. PHTJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FISNX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund
5.70%11.53%5.63%10.21%-13.01%5.62%10.81%14.65%-3.42%5.51%
PHTJX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund
8.12%15.57%12.67%16.45%-17.37%15.57%15.13%22.69%-8.00%8.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FISNX and PHTJX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.87

The correlation between FISNX and PHTJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISNX vs. PHTJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISNX
FISNX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FISNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FISNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PHTJX
PHTJX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PHTJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTJX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTJX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISNX vs. PHTJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund (FISNX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FISNXPHTJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.45

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

3.22

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.81

14.61

+0.20

FISNX vs. PHTJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the PHTJX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISNX and PHTJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FISNXPHTJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

2.41

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.64

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.71

+0.17

Drawdowns

FISNX vs. PHTJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISNX drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, smaller than the maximum PHTJX drawdown of -27.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISNX and PHTJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISNXPHTJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-27.17%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.91%

-6.47%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.77%

-11.58%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.11%

-23.12%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-4.19%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.42%

-0.52%

Volatility

FISNX vs. PHTJX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund (FISNX) is 1.99%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) has a volatility of 2.70%. This indicates that FISNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHTJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISNXPHTJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

2.70%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.18%

6.94%

-2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

8.66%

-3.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.42%

11.79%

-5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.42%

12.51%

-6.09%

FISNX vs. PHTJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FISNX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PHTJX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FISNX vs. PHTJX - Dividend Comparison

FISNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than PHTJX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISNX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund
4.01%3.68%4.39%3.17%5.92%6.53%3.63%5.29%5.20%2.34%0.00%0.00%
PHTJX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund
4.33%4.68%4.09%3.37%8.44%4.96%3.98%3.71%4.01%2.31%1.99%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FISNX and PHTJX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHTJX has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to FISNX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISNX dropped -18.11% vs PHTJX's -27.17%.

FISNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FISNX and PHTJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer