PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIRSX vs. FFGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIRSX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FIRSX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIRSX achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly higher than FFGZX's 4.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FIRSX has outperformed FFGZX with an annualized return of 5.71%, while FFGZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.28% annualized return.


FIRSX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.84%
YTD
4.77%
6M
5.08%
1Y
12.05%
3Y*
8.72%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
5.71%

FFGZX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.75%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.42%
1Y
10.55%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIRSX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIRSX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2015 Fund
4.77%11.12%5.17%9.63%-13.52%5.32%10.88%14.45%-3.68%12.08%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.28%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-0.80%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FIRSX and FFGZX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.90

The correlation between FIRSX and FFGZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIRSX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIRSX
FIRSX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FIRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FIRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIRSX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FIRSX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIRSXFFGZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.54

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.18

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.28

14.23

-0.95

FIRSX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIRSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIRSX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIRSXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.64

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.65

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.97

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.93

-0.40

Drawdowns

FIRSX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIRSX drawdown since its inception was -40.08%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIRSX and FFGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIRSXFFGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.08%

-14.94%

-25.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.92%

-3.33%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.86%

-4.76%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

-14.94%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.54%

-14.94%

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-2.26%

-2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.74%

+0.17%

Volatility

FIRSX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FIRSX) has a higher volatility of 1.88% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.49%. This indicates that FIRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIRSXFFGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

1.49%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

3.34%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.81%

4.01%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.38%

5.08%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.35%

4.43%

+1.92%

FIRSX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIRSX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIRSX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

FIRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than FFGZX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.21%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
FIRSX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2015 Fund
2.88%3.01%2.89%2.68%4.92%5.21%3.39%3.24%6.33%24.28%2.04%4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FIRSX and FFGZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIRSX has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to FFGZX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIRSX dropped -40.08% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIRSX and FFGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer