PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIRFX vs. FNSHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIRFX vs. FNSHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I (FIRFX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K (FNSHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIRFX achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly higher than FNSHX's 4.71% return.


FIRFX

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.65%
YTD
6.10%
6M
6.59%
1Y
14.67%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
6.98%

FNSHX

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.12%
YTD
4.71%
6M
5.11%
1Y
10.82%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIRFX vs. FNSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIRFX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I
6.10%13.43%6.55%11.83%-15.66%8.02%13.09%17.53%-5.07%4.91%
FNSHX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K
4.71%10.35%4.40%8.26%-11.31%3.16%9.01%10.74%-1.86%0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FIRFX and FNSHX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.89

The correlation between FIRFX and FNSHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIRFX vs. FNSHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIRFX
FIRFX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FIRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FIRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSHX
FNSHX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FNSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIRFX vs. FNSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I (FIRFX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K (FNSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIRFXFNSHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.50

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

3.10

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.99

13.60

-0.61

FIRFX vs. FNSHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIRFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the FNSHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIRFX and FNSHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIRFXFNSHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.47

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.60

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.83

-0.32

Drawdowns

FIRFX vs. FNSHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIRFX drawdown since its inception was -41.29%, which is greater than FNSHX's maximum drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIRFX and FNSHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIRFXFNSHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.29%

-15.87%

-25.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-3.68%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.25%

-4.89%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.56%

-15.87%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.25%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-3.04%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.84%

+0.33%

Volatility

FIRFX vs. FNSHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I (FIRFX) has a higher volatility of 2.39% compared to Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K (FNSHX) at 1.94%. This indicates that FIRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIRFXFNSHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

1.94%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.27%

3.92%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.37%

4.62%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.18%

5.35%

+2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.36%

4.84%

+3.52%

FIRFX vs. FNSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIRFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FNSHX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIRFX vs. FNSHX - Dividend Comparison

FIRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than FNSHX's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRFX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I
3.72%2.66%2.56%2.43%4.63%5.08%3.57%3.80%7.10%24.68%2.44%4.49%
FNSHX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K
3.01%3.21%3.19%2.98%5.94%6.17%4.43%3.74%5.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FIRFX and FNSHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIRFX has higher volatility (2.39%) compared to FNSHX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIRFX dropped -41.29% vs FNSHX's -15.87%.

FNSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIRFX and FNSHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer