FIREX vs. AWP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIREX (Fidelity International Real Estate Fund) and AWP (abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 10 years, FIREX returned 3.27%/yr vs 6.71%/yr for AWP. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIREX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for AWP.

Performance

FIREX vs. AWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Real Estate Fund (FIREX) and abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIREX achieves a -3.12% return, which is significantly lower than AWP's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FIREX has underperformed AWP with an annualized return of 3.27%, while AWP has yielded a comparatively higher 6.71% annualized return.

FIREX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -3.21%
• YTD: -3.12%
• 6M: -1.60%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: 3.81%
• 5Y*: -3.20%
• 10Y*: 3.27%

AWP

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -3.34%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 7.44%
• 3Y*: 12.51%
• 5Y*: -0.49%
• 10Y*: 6.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIREX vs. AWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIREX Fidelity International Real Estate Fund	-3.12%	22.85%	-9.46%	4.01%	-26.61%	11.85%	5.71%	27.96%	-6.15%	24.61%
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund	3.18%	12.43%	12.23%	12.58%	-37.13%	40.41%	-10.29%	42.52%	-18.47%	44.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FIREX and AWP is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2007	0.56

The correlation between FIREX and AWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIREX vs. AWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIREX

FIREX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FIREX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FIREX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FIREX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FIREX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FIREX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

AWP

AWP Risk / Return Rank: 6
AWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
AWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
AWP Omega Ratio Rank: 6
AWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
AWP Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIREX vs. AWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Real Estate Fund (FIREX) and abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIREX	AWP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	0.53	-0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.53	0.83	-0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.10	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.27	0.53	-0.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.74	2.15	-1.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIREX vs. AWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIREX Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the AWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIREX and AWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIREX	AWP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31	0.53	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.23	-0.02	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.28	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.06	+0.19

Drawdowns

FIREX vs. AWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIREX drawdown since its inception was -71.40%, smaller than the maximum AWP drawdown of -85.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIREX and AWP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIREX	AWP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.40%	-85.93%	+14.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.75%	-14.14%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	-23.09%	+5.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.14%	-43.93%	+6.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.14%	-53.95%	+16.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.03%	-7.85%	-12.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.73%	-27.39%	+8.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	3.46%	+1.55%

Volatility

FIREX vs. AWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Real Estate Fund (FIREX) is 3.51%, while abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that FIREX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIREX	AWP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	4.42%	-0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.81%	11.12%	-1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.07%	14.00%	-1.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.70%	22.16%	-8.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.77%	23.63%	-9.86%

FIREX vs. AWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIREX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than AWP's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIREX vs. AWP - Dividend Comparison

FIREX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than AWP's 12.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund	12.74%	12.50%	12.44%	12.37%	12.31%	7.02%	9.13%	8.49%	12.05%	8.90%	11.70%	10.40%
FIREX Fidelity International Real Estate Fund	3.06%	2.97%	5.27%	1.86%	4.44%	5.44%	1.77%	5.10%	2.01%	1.46%	4.14%	2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIREX and AWP in my portfolio?

FIREX and AWP have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIREX or AWP?

AWP has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to FIREX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIREX dropped -71.40% vs AWP's -85.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.