FIRCX vs. CREMX
FIRCX (Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class C) and CREMX (Redwood Real Estate Income Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past year, FIRCX returned -0.42% vs 7.47% for CREMX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. FIRCX charges 1.95%/yr vs 5.16%/yr for CREMX.
Performance
FIRCX vs. CREMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIRCX achieves a -5.33% return, which is significantly lower than CREMX's 3.43% return.
FIRCX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- -5.33%
- 6M
- -5.14%
- 1Y
- -0.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- -4.75%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
CREMX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 3.58%
- 1Y
- 7.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIRCX vs. CREMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FIRCX Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class C | -5.33% | 21.46% | -10.40% | 7.59% |
CREMX Redwood Real Estate Income Fund | 3.43% | 7.72% | 8.09% | 1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIRCX and CREMX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2023 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIRCX vs. CREMX — Risk / Return Rank
FIRCX
CREMX
FIRCX vs. CREMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class C (FIRCX) and Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIRCX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -183.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 183.38 | -182.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 191.46 | -191.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.00 | 3,021.25 | -3,021.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIRCX vs. CREMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIRCX drawdown since its inception was -72.03%, which is greater than CREMX's maximum drawdown of -0.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIRCX and CREMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIRCX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.03% | -0.71% | -71.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | -0.04% | -14.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.28% | 0.00% | -25.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -0.02% | -22.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.93% | 0.00% | +5.93% |
Volatility
FIRCX vs. CREMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class C (FIRCX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX) at 0.10%. This indicates that FIRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CREMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIRCX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 0.10% | +3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 0.30% | +9.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.24% | 0.43% | +11.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 0.86% | +12.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.61% | 0.86% | +12.75% |
FIRCX vs. CREMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIRCX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CREMX's 5.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIRCX vs. CREMX - Dividend Comparison
FIRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than CREMX's 7.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CREMX Redwood Real Estate Income Fund | 7.11% | 7.38% | 7.64% | 1.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIRCX Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class C | 2.27% | 2.15% | 4.38% | 0.09% | 4.20% | 4.78% | 0.85% | 3.83% | 1.44% | 1.91% | 3.61% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIRCX and CREMX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIRCX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to CREMX (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIRCX dropped -72.03% vs CREMX's -0.71%.
CREMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.85 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIRCX and CREMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer