FIQTX vs. CCLFX
FIQTX (Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z) and CCLFX (Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FIQTX returned 6.85%/yr vs 8.75%/yr for CCLFX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIQTX charges 0.64%/yr vs 3.42%/yr for CCLFX.
Performance
FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIQTX achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly higher than CCLFX's 2.33% return.
FIQTX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 7.64%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- 1Y
- 16.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- —
CCLFX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 7.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- —
FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQTX Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z | 7.64% | 12.17% | 10.38% | 12.37% | -11.16% | 11.13% | 9.06% | 7.15% |
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 2.33% | 8.93% | 12.62% | 12.66% | 2.32% | 10.38% | 8.73% | 2.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIQTX and CCLFX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIQTX vs. CCLFX — Risk / Return Rank
FIQTX
CCLFX
FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z (FIQTX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIQTX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -15.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 7.24 | -5.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.73 | 39.22 | -33.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.30 | 215.60 | -191.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIQTX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21 | 8.50 | -5.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 5.10 | -4.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 4.57 | -3.64 |
Drawdowns
FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIQTX drawdown since its inception was -28.49%, which is greater than CCLFX's maximum drawdown of -3.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQTX and CCLFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIQTX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.49% | -3.91% | -24.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.12% | -0.19% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.96% | -0.46% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.16% | -2.25% | -12.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -0.16% | -3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.03% | +0.70% |
Volatility
FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z (FIQTX) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) at 0.25%. This indicates that FIQTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIQTX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.70% | 0.25% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.39% | 0.65% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.57% | 0.88% | +4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.40% | 1.73% | +4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.36% | 1.88% | +6.48% |
FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIQTX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than CCLFX's 3.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Dividend Comparison
FIQTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than CCLFX's 10.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 10.28% | 10.47% | 11.27% | 10.96% | 3.96% | 7.03% | 6.90% | 0.61% | 0.00% |
FIQTX Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z | 4.48% | 4.83% | 5.06% | 4.79% | 7.43% | 5.01% | 3.80% | 4.61% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIQTX and CCLFX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIQTX has higher volatility (1.70%) compared to CCLFX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQTX dropped -28.49% vs CCLFX's -3.91%.
CCLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.50 vs 3.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIQTX and CCLFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer