PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQTX vs. CCLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z (FIQTX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQTX achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly higher than CCLFX's 2.33% return.


FIQTX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.16%
YTD
7.64%
6M
8.58%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
12.73%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*

CCLFX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.48%
YTD
2.33%
6M
2.93%
1Y
7.37%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FIQTX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z
7.64%12.17%10.38%12.37%-11.16%11.13%9.06%7.15%
CCLFX
Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund
2.33%8.93%12.62%12.66%2.32%10.38%8.73%2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQTX and CCLFX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQTX vs. CCLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQTX
FIQTX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FIQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CCLFX
CCLFX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CCLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CCLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z (FIQTX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIQTXCCLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-15.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

7.24

-5.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.73

39.22

-33.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.30

215.60

-191.29

FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is lower than the CCLFX Sharpe Ratio of 8.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQTX and CCLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIQTXCCLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21

8.50

-5.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

5.10

-4.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

4.57

-3.64

Drawdowns

FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQTX drawdown since its inception was -28.49%, which is greater than CCLFX's maximum drawdown of -3.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQTX and CCLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQTXCCLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.49%

-3.91%

-24.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.12%

-0.19%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.96%

-0.46%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.16%

-2.25%

-12.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-0.16%

-3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.03%

+0.70%

Volatility

FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z (FIQTX) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) at 0.25%. This indicates that FIQTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQTXCCLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

0.25%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.39%

0.65%

+3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.57%

0.88%

+4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

1.73%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.36%

1.88%

+6.48%

FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQTX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than CCLFX's 3.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQTX vs. CCLFX - Dividend Comparison

FIQTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than CCLFX's 10.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CCLFX
Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund
10.28%10.47%11.27%10.96%3.96%7.03%6.90%0.61%0.00%
FIQTX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z
4.48%4.83%5.06%4.79%7.43%5.01%3.80%4.61%2.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIQTX and CCLFX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQTX has higher volatility (1.70%) compared to CCLFX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQTX dropped -28.49% vs CCLFX's -3.91%.

CCLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.50 vs 3.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQTX and CCLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer