FIQSX vs. FQTIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class Z (FIQSX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX).
FIQSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. FQTIX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 3, 2019.
Performance
FIQSX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIQSX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQSX Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class Z | -0.61% | 5.53% | 8.80% | 11.71% | -1.49% | 5.06% | 1.86% | 3.11% |
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 1.02% | 7.51% | 8.03% | 13.44% | -14.39% | 8.51% | 3.68% | 4.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIQSX achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 1.02% return.
FIQSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.37%
- 10Y*
- —
FQTIX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIQSX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIQSX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIQSX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank
FIQSX
FQTIX
FIQSX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class Z (FIQSX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIQSX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 2.68 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.06 | 3.64 | -1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.64 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 4.19 | -2.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.89 | 18.41 | -9.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIQSX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 2.68 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.90 | 0.63 | +1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.56 | +0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIQSX and FQTIX is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FIQSX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison
FIQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.80%, less than FQTIX's 7.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQSX Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class Z | 6.80% | 7.47% | 8.40% | 7.55% | 3.86% | 2.79% | 3.90% | 5.20% | 1.37% |
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 7.00% | 5.70% | 7.86% | 7.64% | 8.10% | 7.15% | 6.89% | 5.63% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FIQSX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIQSX drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum FQTIX drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQSX and FQTIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIQSX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.19% | -24.62% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.63% | -2.41% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.86% | -18.81% | +12.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -1.47% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -4.42% | +3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 0.55% | +0.03% |
Volatility
FIQSX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class Z (FIQSX) is 0.56%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that FIQSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIQSX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | 1.68% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.62% | 2.43% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24% | 3.87% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.84% | 5.93% | -3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.67% | 7.80% | -3.13% |