FIQPX vs. PRASX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX) and T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX).
FIQPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. PRASX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 27, 1990.
Performance
FIQPX vs. PRASX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIQPX vs. PRASX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQPX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z | 0.95% | 37.22% | 21.13% | 13.98% | -30.50% | -14.73% | 73.23% | 31.17% | 0.71% |
PRASX T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund | -2.85% | 26.60% | 6.97% | 0.83% | -22.60% | -4.33% | 29.56% | 26.75% | 0.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIQPX achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly higher than PRASX's -2.85% return.
FIQPX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -12.51%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 34.45%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
PRASX
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -13.71%
- YTD
- -2.85%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- -1.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIQPX vs. PRASX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIQPX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than PRASX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIQPX vs. PRASX — Risk / Return Rank
FIQPX
PRASX
FIQPX vs. PRASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX) and T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIQPX | PRASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.10 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.19 | 1.54 | +0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.22 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 1.29 | +1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.29 | 5.10 | +3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIQPX | PRASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.10 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | -0.07 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.42 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIQPX and PRASX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIQPX vs. PRASX - Dividend Comparison
FIQPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQPX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 12.82% | 6.63% | 5.47% | 6.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRASX T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund | 0.64% | 0.62% | 1.05% | 1.77% | 1.96% | 14.22% | 0.46% | 0.77% | 7.23% | 9.15% | 0.46% | 1.31% |
Drawdowns
FIQPX vs. PRASX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIQPX drawdown since its inception was -57.62%, smaller than the maximum PRASX drawdown of -70.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQPX and PRASX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIQPX | PRASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.62% | -70.53% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -14.39% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.21% | -42.27% | -10.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.52% | -14.39% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.55% | -18.61% | -3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 3.63% | +0.09% |
Volatility
FIQPX vs. PRASX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX) has a higher volatility of 9.63% compared to T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX) at 9.05%. This indicates that FIQPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIQPX | PRASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.63% | 9.05% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.66% | 14.28% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.33% | 18.76% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 18.54% | +4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 18.00% | +4.85% |