PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQEX vs. LIAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQEX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class Z (FIQEX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQEX achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 26.97% return.


FIQEX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.60%
YTD
7.10%
6M
11.76%
1Y
17.80%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*

LIAGX

1D
0.93%
1M
9.49%
YTD
26.97%
6M
28.29%
1Y
39.93%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQEX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FIQEX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class Z
7.10%25.98%9.25%14.83%-6.02%5.28%
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
26.97%25.09%9.43%15.73%-26.63%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQEX and LIAGX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021

0.71

The correlation between FIQEX and LIAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQEX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQEX
FIQEX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FIQEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQEX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

LIAGX
LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQEX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class Z (FIQEX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIQEXLIAGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

2.02

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

2.76

-0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.86

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.68

11.49

-2.81

FIQEX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQEX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIQEXLIAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.02

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.44

+0.21

Drawdowns

FIQEX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQEX drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than LIAGX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQEX and LIAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQEXLIAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.84%

-37.87%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-14.56%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.05%

-17.11%

+5.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

0.00%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-13.25%

+8.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

3.62%

-1.34%

Volatility

FIQEX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class Z (FIQEX) is 2.68%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.34%. This indicates that FIQEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQEXLIAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

8.34%

-5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

18.00%

-8.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

20.72%

-8.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

18.80%

-2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

18.80%

+0.03%

FIQEX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQEX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQEX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

FIQEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQEX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class Z
5.41%5.80%7.84%3.50%4.07%5.32%2.74%4.64%7.61%
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
0.30%0.38%0.48%0.71%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIQEX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIAGX has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to FIQEX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQEX dropped -39.84% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQEX and LIAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer