PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIOFX vs. SWYHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIOFX vs. SWYHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Investor Class (FIOFX) and Schwab Target 2045 Index Fund (SWYHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIOFX achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly higher than SWYHX's 11.33% return.


FIOFX

1D
0.41%
1M
5.43%
YTD
12.20%
6M
13.11%
1Y
28.24%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
11.87%

SWYHX

1D
0.30%
1M
4.71%
YTD
11.33%
6M
11.84%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
9.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIOFX vs. SWYHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIOFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Investor Class
12.20%21.40%14.14%19.90%-18.21%15.95%16.43%25.96%-7.24%20.59%
SWYHX
Schwab Target 2045 Index Fund
11.33%18.65%13.72%20.34%-17.37%17.04%14.50%24.80%-7.28%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FIOFX and SWYHX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2016

0.98

The correlation between FIOFX and SWYHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIOFX vs. SWYHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIOFX
SWYHX

Technology

25.9%
27.1%

Financial Services

17.1%
15.1%

Industrials

11.7%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
8.9%

Healthcare

9.1%
7.8%

Communication Services

8.0%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
4.6%

Energy

4.7%
4.0%

Basic Materials

4.1%
3.7%

Utilities

2.8%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.1%
7.5%

Technology

FIOFX
25.9%
SWYHX
27.1%

Financial Services

FIOFX
17.1%
SWYHX
15.1%

Industrials

FIOFX
11.7%
SWYHX
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FIOFX
9.4%
SWYHX
8.9%

Healthcare

FIOFX
9.1%
SWYHX
7.8%

Communication Services

FIOFX
8.0%
SWYHX
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

FIOFX
5.2%
SWYHX
4.6%

Energy

FIOFX
4.7%
SWYHX
4.0%

Basic Materials

FIOFX
4.1%
SWYHX
3.7%

Utilities

FIOFX
2.8%
SWYHX
2.5%

Real Estate

FIOFX
2.1%
SWYHX
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIOFX vs. SWYHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIOFX
FIOFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FIOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FIOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SWYHX
SWYHX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SWYHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIOFX vs. SWYHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Investor Class (FIOFX) and Schwab Target 2045 Index Fund (SWYHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIOFXSWYHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.19

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.23

14.32

-0.09

FIOFX vs. SWYHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIOFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the SWYHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIOFX and SWYHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIOFXSWYHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.45

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.69

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.75

-0.03

Drawdowns

FIOFX vs. SWYHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIOFX drawdown since its inception was -30.72%, roughly equal to the maximum SWYHX drawdown of -29.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIOFX and SWYHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIOFXSWYHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.72%

-29.41%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-8.14%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-14.14%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.22%

-24.92%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-4.38%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.81%

+0.20%

Volatility

FIOFX vs. SWYHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Investor Class (FIOFX) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Schwab Target 2045 Index Fund (SWYHX) at 3.22%. This indicates that FIOFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWYHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIOFXSWYHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.22%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

8.41%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48%

10.63%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

14.09%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.15%

15.01%

+0.14%

FIOFX vs. SWYHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIOFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SWYHX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIOFX vs. SWYHX - Dividend Comparison

FIOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than SWYHX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIOFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Investor Class
1.90%2.03%2.01%1.95%2.03%1.92%1.95%14.88%2.26%1.89%2.00%2.01%
SWYHX
Schwab Target 2045 Index Fund
1.87%2.08%2.13%2.02%1.98%1.80%1.65%1.96%2.23%1.42%1.05%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FIOFX and SWYHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIOFX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to SWYHX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIOFX dropped -30.72% vs SWYHX's -29.41%.

FIOFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIOFX and SWYHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer