FINY vs. PLA
FINY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Financials ETF) and PLA (GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.07% expense ratio.
Performance
FINY vs. PLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FINY
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLA
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FINY vs. PLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FINY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Financials ETF | 3.82% |
PLA GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF | -4.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FINY and PLA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2026 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FINY vs. PLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Financials ETF (FINY) and GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF (PLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FINY vs. PLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FINY drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum PLA drawdown of -12.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINY and PLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FINY | PLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -12.39% | +11.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.61% | +8.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.07% | -4.60% | +4.53% |
Volatility
FINY vs. PLA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FINY | PLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.53% | 23.47% | -18.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 23.47% | -18.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 23.47% | -18.94% |
FINY vs. PLA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FINY and PLA have an expense ratio of 1.07%.
Dividends
FINY vs. PLA - Dividend Comparison
FINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than PLA's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
FINY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Financials ETF | 3.88% |
PLA GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF | 1.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FINY and PLA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FINY and PLA have the same expense ratio: 1.07% per year.
FINY has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 1.78% for PLA.
Find the right allocation for FINY and PLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer