PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FINX.L vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FINX.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Acc (FINX.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FINX.L is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FINX.L achieves a -11.90% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 17.97% return.


FINX.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
4.33%
6M
-11.90%
YTD
-11.90%
1Y
-23.33%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
10Y*

XLKQ.L

1D
-0.46%
1M
-2.56%
6M
20.54%
YTD
17.97%
1Y
32.89%
3Y*
31.49%
5Y*
22.29%
10Y*
25.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FINX.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FINX.L
Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Acc
-11.90%-5.95%22.04%36.70%-52.82%-16.40%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
17.97%24.49%41.63%59.85%-29.07%4.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FINX.L and XLKQ.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.62

The correlation between FINX.L and XLKQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FINX.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FINX.L
FINX.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FINX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FINX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FINX.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Acc (FINX.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FINX.LXLKQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.26

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

1.95

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

5.35

-6.40

FINX.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FINX.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FINX.L and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FINX.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINX.L drawdown since its inception was -62.08%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -39.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINX.L and XLKQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FINX.LXLKQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.08%

-39.80%

-22.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.51%

-16.81%

-19.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.51%

-26.96%

-9.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.48%

-7.48%

-38.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.53%

-9.18%

-35.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.04%

6.13%

+15.91%

Volatility

FINX.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Acc (FINX.L) has a higher volatility of 8.64% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) at 7.47%. This indicates that FINX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FINX.LXLKQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.64%

7.47%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.04%

17.08%

+6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.41%

21.52%

+7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.30%

27.46%

+3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.30%

23.97%

+7.33%

Dividends

FINX.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FINX.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FINX.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FINX.L tracks Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Acc, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FINX.L and XLKQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer