PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FINT.TO vs. ZDM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FINT.TO vs. ZDM.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

FINT.TO (First Trust International Capital Strength ETF) and ZDM.TO (BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF) are both International Equity funds - FINT.TO tracks the Nasdaq International Capital Strength Index while ZDM.TO tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FINT.TO returned 8.29%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for ZDM.TO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FINT.TO vs. ZDM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in First Trust International Capital Strength ETF (FINT.TO) and BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZDM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FINT.TO having a 12.84% return and ZDM.TO slightly lower at 12.44%.

FINT.TO

1D
0.14%
1M
-2.99%
6M
7.55%
YTD
12.84%
1Y
25.05%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
—

ZDM.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
1.16%
6M
7.93%
YTD
12.44%
1Y
24.57%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FINT.TO vs. ZDM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FINT.TO
First Trust International Capital Strength ETF		12.84%28.55%6.00%11.49%-14.84%12.52%14.71%31.52%-19.50%
ZDM.TO
BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF		12.44%20.34%12.72%18.62%-5.78%18.93%0.25%20.03%-11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FINT.TO and ZDM.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2018

0.18

The correlation between FINT.TO and ZDM.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

First Trust International Capital Strength ETF

BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF

Often compared with ZDM.TO:
ZDM.TO vs. ZEA.TOZDM.TO vs. VI.TOZDM.TO vs. FCCM.NEOZDM.TO vs. VIU.TOZDM.TO vs. EQCL.TOZDM.TO vs. XEF.TOZDM.TO vs. KNGX.TO

Return for Risk

FINT.TO vs. ZDM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FINT.TO
FINT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FINT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FINT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
ZDM.TO
ZDM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ZDM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FINT.TO vs. ZDM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Capital Strength ETF (FINT.TO) and BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZDM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FINT.TOZDM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.52
1.81

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.25
2.58

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.34

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.51

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.67

10.36

-2.69

FINT.TO vs. ZDM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FINT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the ZDM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FINT.TO and ZDM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FINT.TO vs. ZDM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINT.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.12%, smaller than the maximum ZDM.TO drawdown of -33.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINT.TO and ZDM.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FINT.TOZDM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.12%

-33.45%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

-9.82%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.37%

-14.07%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.43%

-15.63%

-12.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.45%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-1.13%

-3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-5.14%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

2.38%

+0.89%

Volatility

FINT.TO vs. ZDM.TO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust International Capital Strength ETF (FINT.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZDM.TO) at 3.18%. This indicates that FINT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZDM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FINT.TOZDM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

3.18%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.87%

11.46%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

13.61%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

13.88%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.42%

15.63%

+1.79%

Dividends

FINT.TO vs. ZDM.TO - Dividend Comparison

FINT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than ZDM.TO's 1.90% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FINT.TO
First Trust International Capital Strength ETF		1.93%2.00%1.42%2.00%1.26%0.00%0.25%1.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZDM.TO
BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF		1.90%2.13%2.71%2.97%3.20%2.38%2.80%2.97%3.29%2.47%3.30%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

FINT.TO and ZDM.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FINT.TO tracks Nasdaq International Capital Strength Index, while ZDM.TO tracks MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and BMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FINT.TO and ZDM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer