FINN.NEO vs. FCCQ.TO
FINN.NEO (Fidelity Global Innovators ETF) and FCCQ.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FINN.NEO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FCCQ.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index. FINN.NEO is actively managed, while FCCQ.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FINN.NEO returned 46.00%/yr vs 22.31%/yr for FCCQ.TO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FINN.NEO charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FCCQ.TO.
Performance
FINN.NEO vs. FCCQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FINN.NEO achieves a 42.01% return, which is significantly higher than FCCQ.TO's 6.62% return.
FINN.NEO
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 13.10%
- YTD
- 42.01%
- 6M
- 41.28%
- 1Y
- 74.64%
- 3Y*
- 46.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCCQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 31.20%
- 3Y*
- 22.31%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- —
FINN.NEO vs. FCCQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FINN.NEO Fidelity Global Innovators ETF | 42.01% | 20.61% | 58.65% | 17.86% |
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 6.62% | 31.01% | 21.58% | 8.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FINN.NEO and FCCQ.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2023 | 0.49 |
The correlation between FINN.NEO and FCCQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FINN.NEO vs. FCCQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FINN.NEO
FCCQ.TO
FINN.NEO vs. FCCQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO) and Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FINN.NEO | FCCQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.39 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | 2.78 | +3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.93 | 11.87 | +9.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FINN.NEO | FCCQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36 | 2.17 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.12 | 0.80 | +1.32 |
Drawdowns
FINN.NEO vs. FCCQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FINN.NEO drawdown since its inception was -25.66%, smaller than the maximum FCCQ.TO drawdown of -35.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINN.NEO and FCCQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FINN.NEO | FCCQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.66% | -35.31% | +9.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -11.29% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -13.41% | -12.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -2.68% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -3.99% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 2.64% | +0.94% |
Volatility
FINN.NEO vs. FCCQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) at 4.12%. This indicates that FINN.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCCQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FINN.NEO | FCCQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 4.12% | +3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.72% | 12.07% | +5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.38% | 14.47% | +7.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 13.72% | +8.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 16.05% | +6.23% |
FINN.NEO vs. FCCQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FINN.NEO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FCCQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FINN.NEO vs. FCCQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
FINN.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCCQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 1.47% | 1.45% | 1.83% | 2.40% | 2.31% | 1.90% | 2.10% | 2.30% |
FINN.NEO Fidelity Global Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FINN.NEO and FCCQ.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCCQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCCQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for FINN.NEO.
FINN.NEO is categorized as Technology Equities, while FCCQ.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for FINN.NEO and 0.35% for FCCQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for FINN.NEO and FCCQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer