FING.L vs. SILG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FING.L (Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - FING.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Fintech Thematic, while SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FING.L returned 2.99%/yr vs 45.46%/yr for SILG.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FING.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SILG.L.

Performance

FING.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing (FING.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FING.L achieves a -16.91% return, which is significantly lower than SILG.L's 5.25% return.

FING.L

• 1D: -4.14%
• 1M: -2.65%
• YTD: -16.91%
• 6M: -19.10%
• 1Y: -19.47%
• 3Y*: 2.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SILG.L

• 1D: -4.05%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 5.25%
• 6M: 14.13%
• 1Y: 102.76%
• 3Y*: 45.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FING.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FING.L Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing	-16.91%	-12.16%	24.04%	29.09%	-23.27%
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	5.25%	153.98%	13.53%	-6.34%	-8.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FING.L and SILG.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022	0.24

Return for Risk

FING.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FING.L

FING.L Risk / Return Rank: 4
FING.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FING.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FING.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FING.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FING.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4

SILG.L

SILG.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
SILG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SILG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SILG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SILG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SILG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FING.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing (FING.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FING.L	SILG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	2.06	-2.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.91	2.49	-3.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.31	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	3.29	-3.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.00	8.07	-9.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FING.L vs. SILG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FING.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the SILG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FING.L and SILG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FING.L	SILG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.75	2.06	-2.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.45	0.67	-1.12

Drawdowns

FING.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FING.L drawdown since its inception was -56.45%, which is greater than SILG.L's maximum drawdown of -32.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FING.L and SILG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FING.L	SILG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.45%	-32.00%	-24.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.51%	-30.90%	-5.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.02%	-30.90%	-7.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.60%	-24.83%	-21.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.72%	-12.50%	-27.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.42%	12.64%	+6.78%

Volatility

FING.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing (FING.L) is 7.42%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 18.54%. This indicates that FING.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FING.L	SILG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.42%	18.54%	-11.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.97%	40.08%	-20.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.07%	49.23%	-23.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.65%	39.42%	-10.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.65%	39.42%	-10.77%

FING.L vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FING.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FING.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FING.L nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FING.L Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%	0.08%
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FING.L and SILG.L in my portfolio?

FING.L and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FING.L or SILG.L?

On fees, FING.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FING.L or SILG.L?

FING.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.

What is the main difference between FING.L and SILG.L?

FING.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while SILG.L is Silver. FING.L tracks Indxx Global Fintech Thematic, while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FING.L and 0.65% for SILG.L.