PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIND.L vs. DGRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIND.L vs. DGRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated (FIND.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIND.L achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly higher than DGRA.L's 6.76% return.


FIND.L

1D
-0.61%
1M
4.52%
YTD
15.30%
6M
20.95%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
8.51%

DGRA.L

1D
0.12%
1M
3.51%
YTD
6.76%
6M
6.13%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIND.L vs. DGRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIND.L
WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated
15.30%19.87%3.63%-11.12%-1.92%28.50%14.41%5.70%-20.26%27.06%
DGRA.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc
6.76%13.09%18.23%18.70%-8.32%25.27%12.58%28.83%-6.56%26.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FIND.L and DGRA.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIND.L vs. DGRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIND.L
FIND.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FIND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FIND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRA.L
DGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIND.L vs. DGRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated (FIND.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIND.LDGRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.63

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.30

10.40

-4.11

FIND.L vs. DGRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIND.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIND.L and DGRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIND.LDGRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.84

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.83

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.91

-0.89

Drawdowns

FIND.L vs. DGRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIND.L drawdown since its inception was -65.36%, which is greater than DGRA.L's maximum drawdown of -31.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIND.L and DGRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIND.LDGRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.36%

-31.66%

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.60%

-7.54%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-16.17%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.56%

-17.94%

-22.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.03%

-0.04%

-12.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.53%

-3.54%

-38.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

1.91%

+3.18%

Volatility

FIND.L vs. DGRA.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated (FIND.L) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) at 2.43%. This indicates that FIND.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIND.LDGRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

2.43%

+3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.74%

7.67%

+6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.31%

10.75%

+8.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

14.10%

+8.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

14.92%

+4.79%

FIND.L vs. DGRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIND.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRA.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIND.L vs. DGRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FIND.L nor DGRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FIND.L and DGRA.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRA.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRA.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FIND.L.

FIND.L is categorized as Metals, while DGRA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. FIND.L tracks Bloomberg Industrial Metals 3 Month Forward, while DGRA.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FIND.L and 0.33% for DGRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIND.L and DGRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer