FIMTX vs. MUC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIMTX (Federated Hermes Intermediate Municipal Fund) and MUC (BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FIMTX returned 1.80%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for MUC. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIMTX charges 0.69%/yr vs 2.14%/yr for MUC.

Performance

FIMTX vs. MUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Intermediate Municipal Fund (FIMTX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIMTX achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than MUC's 4.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FIMTX has outperformed MUC with an annualized return of 1.80%, while MUC has yielded a comparatively lower 0.78% annualized return.

FIMTX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 0.67%
• 6M: 1.14%
• 1Y: 5.01%
• 3Y*: 3.32%
• 5Y*: 0.73%
• 10Y*: 1.80%

MUC

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 4.06%
• 6M: 3.70%
• 1Y: 10.52%
• 3Y*: 6.28%
• 5Y*: -2.69%
• 10Y*: 0.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIMTX vs. MUC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIMTX Federated Hermes Intermediate Municipal Fund	0.67%	4.62%	0.89%	5.97%	-7.94%	0.59%	4.63%	7.20%	0.46%	4.47%
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund	4.06%	5.96%	0.76%	7.86%	-26.81%	7.38%	11.85%	18.12%	-9.00%	6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FIMTX and MUC is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.34

The correlation between FIMTX and MUC shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FIMTX vs. MUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIMTX

FIMTX Risk / Return Rank: 17
FIMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FIMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FIMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FIMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FIMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

MUC

MUC Risk / Return Rank: 23
MUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
MUC Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
MUC Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIMTX vs. MUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Intermediate Municipal Fund (FIMTX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIMTX	MUC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	1.31	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	2.08	-1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.25	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	1.62	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.99	6.57	-0.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIMTX vs. MUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIMTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the MUC Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIMTX and MUC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIMTX	MUC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	1.31	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	-0.24	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.07	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.29	+0.12

Drawdowns

FIMTX vs. MUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIMTX drawdown since its inception was -12.62%, smaller than the maximum MUC drawdown of -48.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIMTX and MUC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIMTX	MUC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.62%	-48.97%	+36.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.50%	-6.53%	-2.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.81%	-14.51%	+4.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.62%	-38.29%	+25.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.62%	-38.29%	+25.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-16.50%	+15.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.26%	-9.90%	+7.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.31%	1.60%	-0.29%

Volatility

FIMTX vs. MUC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Intermediate Municipal Fund (FIMTX) is 0.93%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has a volatility of 2.37%. This indicates that FIMTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIMTX	MUC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.93%	2.37%	-1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.69%	6.24%	-4.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.74%	8.05%	+7.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.41%	11.50%	-4.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.83%	11.89%	-6.06%

FIMTX vs. MUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIMTX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than MUC's 2.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIMTX vs. MUC - Dividend Comparison

FIMTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than MUC's 5.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIMTX Federated Hermes Intermediate Municipal Fund	1.76%	2.91%	2.44%	2.11%	1.41%	1.55%	2.39%	2.57%	2.66%	2.36%	3.51%	2.52%
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund	5.97%	6.06%	5.62%	3.84%	5.79%	4.27%	3.96%	3.90%	4.99%	5.14%	5.45%	5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIMTX and MUC in my portfolio?

FIMTX and MUC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIMTX or MUC?

MUC has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to FIMTX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIMTX dropped -12.62% vs MUC's -48.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.