PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIKNX vs. ICISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIKNX vs. ICISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX) and VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio (ICISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIKNX achieves a 26.84% return, which is significantly higher than ICISX's 24.13% return.


FIKNX

1D
-0.67%
1M
7.00%
6M
25.71%
YTD
26.84%
1Y
34.44%
3Y*
18.05%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*

ICISX

1D
-0.17%
1M
6.69%
6M
23.33%
YTD
24.13%
1Y
35.08%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
11.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIKNX vs. ICISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIKNX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z
26.84%8.18%8.00%17.97%-12.98%38.27%11.35%20.98%-13.08%
ICISX
VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio
24.13%8.38%11.15%14.13%-13.57%34.53%9.95%20.26%-16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKNX and ICISX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.94

The correlation between FIKNX and ICISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIKNX vs. ICISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIKNX
FIKNX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FIKNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ICISX
ICISX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ICISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICISX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ICISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICISX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIKNX vs. ICISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX) and VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio (ICISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIKNXICISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

4.18

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.98

14.55

-2.57

FIKNX vs. ICISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the ICISX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKNX and ICISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIKNX vs. ICISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKNX drawdown since its inception was -44.09%, smaller than the maximum ICISX drawdown of -59.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKNX and ICISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIKNXICISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.09%

-59.91%

+15.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-9.50%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-28.05%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.87%

-28.05%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-0.74%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-10.78%

+3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.62%

+0.33%

Volatility

FIKNX vs. ICISX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio (ICISX) at 4.53%. This indicates that FIKNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIKNXICISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

4.53%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

11.97%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.06%

17.02%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

21.65%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.57%

23.61%

+0.96%

FIKNX vs. ICISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKNX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than ICISX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIKNX vs. ICISX - Dividend Comparison

FIKNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.08%, less than ICISX's 22.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKNX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z
8.08%10.24%4.82%5.32%5.92%8.07%0.58%3.65%8.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICISX
VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio
22.52%27.95%11.14%7.68%17.24%0.74%4.30%13.90%14.67%4.45%4.26%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIKNX and ICISX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIKNX has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to ICISX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKNX dropped -44.09% vs ICISX's -59.91%.

ICISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIKNX and ICISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer