FIKMX vs. TAREX
FIKMX (Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z) and TAREX (Third Avenue Real Estate Value Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, FIKMX returned 3.64%/yr vs 3.75%/yr for TAREX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIKMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for TAREX.
Performance
FIKMX vs. TAREX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKMX achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly higher than TAREX's -6.24% return.
FIKMX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 4.35%
- 1Y
- 7.63%
- 3Y*
- 8.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.64%
- 10Y*
- —
TAREX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- -6.24%
- 6M
- -7.00%
- 1Y
- -1.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
FIKMX vs. TAREX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 4.26% | 7.29% | 8.03% | 9.51% | -14.48% | 19.04% | -0.98% | 18.04% | -1.71% |
TAREX Third Avenue Real Estate Value Fund | -6.24% | 12.52% | 13.54% | 23.48% | -26.53% | 30.69% | -8.23% | 21.09% | -7.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKMX and TAREX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between FIKMX and TAREX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIKMX vs. TAREX — Risk / Return Rank
FIKMX
TAREX
FIKMX vs. TAREX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) and Third Avenue Real Estate Value Fund (TAREX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIKMX | TAREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.01 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | -0.00 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | -0.01 | +10.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIKMX vs. TAREX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKMX drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, smaller than the maximum TAREX drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKMX and TAREX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKMX | TAREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -67.68% | +33.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | -15.81% | +12.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.16% | -19.88% | +12.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | -31.89% | +13.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -10.18% | +9.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.11% | -11.17% | +6.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 6.18% | -5.39% |
Volatility
FIKMX vs. TAREX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) is 1.28%, while Third Avenue Real Estate Value Fund (TAREX) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that FIKMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAREX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIKMX | TAREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 4.34% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.24% | 11.98% | -8.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15% | 15.54% | -11.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.48% | 18.38% | -11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.56% | 18.72% | -8.16% |
FIKMX vs. TAREX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TAREX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIKMX vs. TAREX - Dividend Comparison
FIKMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, less than TAREX's 6.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 4.64% | 4.80% | 4.81% | 5.15% | 6.24% | 1.59% | 4.90% | 5.82% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAREX Third Avenue Real Estate Value Fund | 6.06% | 5.68% | 6.59% | 5.28% | 8.76% | 9.03% | 0.99% | 18.22% | 11.07% | 1.06% | 1.80% | 5.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIKMX and TAREX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAREX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to FIKMX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKMX dropped -34.49% vs TAREX's -67.68%.
FIKMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIKMX and TAREX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer