FIKHX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FIKHX (Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - FIKHX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIKHX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

FIKHX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FIKHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FCNTX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 10.40%
• 1Y: 23.87%
• 3Y*: 27.27%
• 5Y*: 15.06%
• 10Y*: 17.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIKHX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	0.00%	24.77%	35.52%	59.89%	-35.93%	27.74%	64.56%	51.18%	-17.39%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	8.62%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-11.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKHX and FCNTX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018	0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between FIKHX and FCNTX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FIKHX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIKHX	FCNTX
Technology	97.9%	27.0%
Consumer Cyclical	1.2%	10.1%
Communication Services	0.8%	21.2%
Basic Materials	0.0%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.7%
Energy	-	3.6%
Financial Services	-	13.8%
Healthcare	-	9.2%
Industrials	-	8.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

FIKHX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIKHX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIKHX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.78	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FIKHX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-49.19%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-8.16%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.65%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FIKHX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.30%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	14.02%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	19.15%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	19.68%	—

FIKHX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKHX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIKHX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FIKHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%, more than FCNTX's 4.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.30%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	9.85%	9.85%	7.33%	3.86%	3.32%	11.52%	7.42%	2.64%	22.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIKHX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

FIKHX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.