FIJBX vs. NQP
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIJBX) and Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income (NQP).
FIJBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. NQP is an actively managed fund by Nuveen. It was launched on Feb 21, 1991.
Performance
FIJBX vs. NQP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIJBX vs. NQP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIJBX Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z | -0.82% | 5.78% | 2.00% | 6.18% | -9.60% | 1.42% | 4.53% | 7.63% | 2.55% |
NQP Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income | 2.14% | 15.46% | 2.70% | 7.44% | -21.95% | 7.75% | 7.08% | 21.21% | 0.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIJBX achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than NQP's 2.14% return.
FIJBX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.98%
- 10Y*
- —
NQP
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 13.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.65%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIJBX vs. NQP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIJBX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than NQP's 1.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIJBX vs. NQP — Risk / Return Rank
FIJBX
NQP
FIJBX vs. NQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIJBX) and Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income (NQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIJBX | NQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 1.50 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 2.27 | -1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.31 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 3.27 | -2.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | 8.94 | -5.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIJBX | NQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.50 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.17 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.41 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIJBX and NQP is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FIJBX vs. NQP - Dividend Comparison
FIJBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than NQP's 7.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIJBX Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z | 3.03% | 3.90% | 2.88% | 2.46% | 1.69% | 2.31% | 2.82% | 2.85% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NQP Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income | 7.86% | 7.87% | 6.69% | 3.07% | 4.89% | 4.51% | 4.38% | 4.23% | 5.34% | 5.34% | 5.67% | 6.10% |
Drawdowns
FIJBX vs. NQP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIJBX drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum NQP drawdown of -41.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJBX and NQP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIJBX | NQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -41.87% | +27.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -4.63% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.03% | -32.41% | +18.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -1.68% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -6.93% | +3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 1.69% | -0.30% |
Volatility
FIJBX vs. NQP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIJBX) is 1.32%, while Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income (NQP) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that FIJBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIJBX | NQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 4.13% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.86% | 5.32% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.04% | 9.22% | -4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 9.80% | -5.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 10.85% | -6.37% |