PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIJBX vs. FSMUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FIJBX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIJBX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FIJBX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FIJBX
Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z
-0.82%5.78%2.00%6.18%-9.60%0.70%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
-0.79%3.14%2.99%6.78%-11.25%0.39%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIJBX having a -0.82% return and FSMUX slightly higher at -0.79%.


FIJBX

1D
0.33%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
-0.82%
6M
0.77%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
0.98%
10Y*

FSMUX

1D
0.34%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-0.79%
6M
0.46%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
3.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FIJBX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIJBX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FIJBX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIJBX
FIJBX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FIJBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIJBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIJBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FIJBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIJBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMUX
FSMUX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FSMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIJBX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIJBX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIJBXFSMUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

0.49

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

0.69

+0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.15

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

0.28

+0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.90

0.78

+3.12

FIJBX vs. FSMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIJBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the FSMUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIJBX and FSMUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIJBXFSMUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

0.49

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.01

+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between FIJBX and FSMUX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FIJBX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison

FIJBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, more than FSMUX's 2.34% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FIJBX
Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z
3.03%3.90%2.88%2.46%1.69%2.31%2.82%2.85%0.76%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
2.34%3.26%3.74%3.18%2.14%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FIJBX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIJBX drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJBX and FSMUX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FIJBXFSMUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.03%

-16.27%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.00%

-5.30%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-2.23%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-5.61%

+2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.96%

-0.57%

Volatility

FIJBX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIJBX) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) at 1.09%. This indicates that FIJBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FIJBXFSMUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

1.09%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.86%

2.14%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.04%

6.65%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.93%

4.67%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.48%

4.67%

-0.19%