FIIMX vs. ATGAX
FIIMX (Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FIIMX charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.
Performance
FIIMX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FIIMX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 21.25%
- 6M
- 21.32%
- 1Y
- 38.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
ATGAX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIIMX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FIIMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I | 1.26% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIIMX and ATGAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIIMX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank
FIIMX
ATGAX
FIIMX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I (FIIMX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIIMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIIMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 18.80 | -18.27 |
Drawdowns
FIIMX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIIMX drawdown since its inception was -53.22%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIIMX and ATGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIIMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.22% | -0.36% | -52.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.36% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -0.09% | -7.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | — | — |
Volatility
FIIMX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIIMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.14% | 11.18% | +5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.33% | 11.18% | +9.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 11.18% | +9.81% |
FIIMX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIIMX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIIMX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
FIIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIIMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I | 5.67% | 6.06% | 6.79% | 2.71% | 5.70% | 18.41% | 1.29% | 3.30% | 10.56% | 7.67% | 4.84% | 4.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, FIIMX and ATGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for FIIMX and ATGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer