FIIG vs. BSCQ
FIIG (First Trust Intermediate Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. FIIG is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. Over the past year, FIIG returned 5.17% vs 4.41% for BSCQ. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIIG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
FIIG vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIIG achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.55% return.
FIIG
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
FIIG vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FIIG First Trust Intermediate Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF | -0.56% | 8.80% | 2.15% | 6.83% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.55% | 5.02% | 4.86% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIIG and BSCQ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2023 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FIIG and BSCQ has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIIG vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
FIIG
BSCQ
FIIG vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Intermediate Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FIIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIIG | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -13.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 3.45 | -2.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 43.24 | -41.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 179.65 | -174.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIIG | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 7.06 | -5.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.60 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
FIIG vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIIG drawdown since its inception was -5.50%, smaller than the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIIG and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIIG | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -16.50% | +11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.15% | -0.10% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | 0.00% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -2.85% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.02% | +0.96% |
Volatility
FIIG vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Intermediate Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FIIG) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.17%. This indicates that FIIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIIG | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | 0.17% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.38% | 0.43% | +2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.61% | 0.63% | +3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.91% | 3.30% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.91% | 4.77% | +1.14% |
FIIG vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIIG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIIG vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
FIIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than BSCQ's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
FIIG First Trust Intermediate Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF | 4.96% | 4.76% | 4.45% | 1.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIIG and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIIG has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to BSCQ (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIIG dropped -5.50% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.
On 1-year performance, FIIG leads with 5.17% vs 4.41% for BSCQ. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FIIG has performed better with a 5.17% return vs 4.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FIIG.
FIIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 4.12% for BSCQ.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FIIG and 0.10% for BSCQ.
BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.06 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIIG and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer