FIIFX vs. FCBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Intermediate Corporate Bond Fund (FIIFX) and Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX).
FIIFX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Dec 20, 1993. FCBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 4, 2010.
Performance
FIIFX vs. FCBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIIFX vs. FCBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIIFX Federated Hermes Intermediate Corporate Bond Fund | -1.02% | 7.62% | 3.20% | 5.66% | -10.03% | -1.61% | 7.58% | 9.72% | -0.48% | 4.32% |
FCBFX Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund | -1.20% | 7.86% | 2.82% | 8.82% | -17.11% | -1.59% | 10.59% | 14.48% | -2.56% | 6.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIIFX achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly higher than FCBFX's -1.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FIIFX has underperformed FCBFX with an annualized return of 2.47%, while FCBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.84% annualized return.
FIIFX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 4.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
FCBFX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -1.20%
- 6M
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIIFX vs. FCBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIIFX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FCBFX's 0.44% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIIFX vs. FCBFX — Risk / Return Rank
FIIFX
FCBFX
FIIFX vs. FCBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Intermediate Corporate Bond Fund (FIIFX) and Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIIFX | FCBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.49 | 0.98 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 1.37 | +0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.17 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.55 | +0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | 5.00 | +3.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIIFX | FCBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 0.98 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.07 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.48 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.70 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIIFX and FCBFX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIIFX vs. FCBFX - Dividend Comparison
FIIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than FCBFX's 3.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIIFX Federated Hermes Intermediate Corporate Bond Fund | 3.89% | 4.15% | 3.39% | 2.95% | 1.97% | 2.69% | 2.64% | 2.92% | 4.02% | 4.27% | 3.30% | 3.79% |
FCBFX Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund | 3.85% | 4.11% | 3.95% | 3.74% | 2.53% | 2.82% | 3.19% | 3.28% | 3.65% | 3.16% | 3.55% | 3.01% |
Drawdowns
FIIFX vs. FCBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIIFX drawdown since its inception was -14.85%, smaller than the maximum FCBFX drawdown of -23.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIIFX and FCBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIIFX | FCBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.85% | -23.23% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.28% | -3.31% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.85% | -23.21% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.85% | -23.23% | +8.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -2.76% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -4.00% | +2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 1.03% | -0.45% |
Volatility
FIIFX vs. FCBFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Intermediate Corporate Bond Fund (FIIFX) is 1.02%, while Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that FIIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIIFX | FCBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 1.85% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.97% | 2.86% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | 4.78% | -1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 6.68% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.80% | 5.94% | -2.14% |