FIICX vs. ATGAX
FIICX (Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class C) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FIICX charges 1.83%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.
Performance
FIICX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FIICX
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 21.02%
- 6M
- 22.21%
- 1Y
- 37.09%
- 3Y*
- 20.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
ATGAX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIICX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FIICX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class C | 1.47% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIICX and ATGAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIICX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank
FIICX
ATGAX
FIICX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class C (FIICX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIICX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.26 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.08 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.71 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIICX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 58.33 | -57.85 |
Drawdowns
FIICX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIICX drawdown since its inception was -53.75%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIICX and ATGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIICX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.75% | 0.00% | -53.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.62% | 0.00% | -8.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | — | — |
Volatility
FIICX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIICX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 9.26% | +7.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 9.26% | +11.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.32% | 9.26% | +12.06% |
FIICX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIICX has a 1.83% expense ratio, which is higher than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIICX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
FIICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIICX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class C | 7.64% | 8.11% | 14.08% | 2.98% | 6.81% | 21.73% | 1.13% | 3.23% | 11.72% | 8.22% | 4.95% | 5.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, FIICX and ATGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for FIICX and ATGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer