FIGSX vs. LIAGX
FIGSX (Fidelity Series International Growth Fund) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, FIGSX returned 13.32%/yr vs 21.75%/yr for LIAGX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIGSX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.
Performance
FIGSX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGSX achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 27.78% return.
FIGSX
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 15.33%
- 3Y*
- 13.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
LIAGX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 10.09%
- YTD
- 27.78%
- 6M
- 28.66%
- 1Y
- 41.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIGSX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGSX Fidelity Series International Growth Fund | 7.48% | 19.12% | 5.93% | 21.74% | -22.87% | 5.03% |
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 27.78% | 25.09% | 9.43% | 15.73% | -26.63% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIGSX and LIAGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FIGSX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIGSX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank
FIGSX
LIAGX
FIGSX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIGSX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.36 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 2.82 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 11.32 | -7.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIGSX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.99 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.45 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
FIGSX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGSX drawdown since its inception was -34.47%, smaller than the maximum LIAGX drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGSX and LIAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIGSX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.47% | -37.87% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -14.56% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.29% | -17.11% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | 0.00% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -13.24% | +6.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 3.62% | +0.13% |
Volatility
FIGSX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX) is 7.37%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that FIGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIGSX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 8.29% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.91% | 18.01% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 20.68% | -2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 18.79% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 18.79% | -0.98% |
FIGSX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIGSX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIGSX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison
FIGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.07%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGSX Fidelity Series International Growth Fund | 8.07% | 8.67% | 4.29% | 1.27% | 3.53% | 8.33% | 16.24% | 3.64% | 7.47% | 3.14% | 2.54% | 3.54% |
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FIGSX and LIAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LIAGX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to FIGSX (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIGSX dropped -34.47% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.
LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIGSX and LIAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer