PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIGG vs. VRTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIGG vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long FIG Daily ETF (FIGG) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIGG achieves a -74.27% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 230.54% return.


FIGG

1D
-12.59%
1M
18.39%
YTD
-74.27%
6M
-75.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VRTL

1D
-1.32%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
230.54%
6M
160.92%
1Y
442.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIGG vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FIGG
Leverage Shares 2X Long FIG Daily ETF
-74.27%-65.98%
VRTL
GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF
230.54%-22.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FIGG and VRTL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIGG vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIGG

VRTL
VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIGG vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FIG Daily ETF (FIGG) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FIGG vs. VRTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIGGVRTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.66

3.29

-3.95

Drawdowns

FIGG vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIGG drawdown since its inception was -95.11%, which is greater than VRTL's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGG and VRTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIGGVRTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.11%

-60.58%

-34.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.99%

-24.11%

-67.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.03%

-15.16%

-61.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.53%

Volatility

FIGG vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIGGVRTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

148.39%

114.32%

+34.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

148.39%

124.39%

+24.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

148.39%

124.39%

+24.00%

FIGG vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIGG vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison

Neither FIGG nor VRTL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FIGG and VRTL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FIGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FIGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

FIGG and VRTL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FIGG and 1.50% for VRTL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIGG and VRTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer