FIG.TO vs. ZCB.TO
FIG.TO (CI Investment Grade Bond ETF) and ZCB.TO (BMO Corporate Bond Index ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. FIG.TO is actively managed, while ZCB.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIG.TO returned 1.01%/yr vs 2.15%/yr for ZCB.TO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FIG.TO vs. ZCB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIG.TO having a 2.05% return and ZCB.TO slightly higher at 2.10%.
FIG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- 5.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.30%
ZCB.TO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.15%
- 10Y*
- —
FIG.TO vs. ZCB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIG.TO CI Investment Grade Bond ETF | 2.05% | 5.12% | 5.10% | 6.23% | -12.53% | -1.69% | 7.78% | 6.98% | 0.66% |
ZCB.TO BMO Corporate Bond Index ETF | 2.10% | 3.81% | 6.60% | 8.73% | -10.20% | -2.22% | 8.33% | 8.03% | 0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIG.TO and ZCB.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2018 | 0.55 |
The correlation between FIG.TO and ZCB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIG.TO vs. ZCB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FIG.TO
ZCB.TO
FIG.TO vs. ZCB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIG.TO) and BMO Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIG.TO | ZCB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 1.47 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 4.48 | -0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIG.TO vs. ZCB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIG.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.80%, which is greater than ZCB.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIG.TO and ZCB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIG.TO | ZCB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.80% | -15.70% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.27% | -2.55% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.24% | -3.14% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.97% | -14.20% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.24% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -3.67% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.86% | +0.08% |
Volatility
FIG.TO vs. ZCB.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIG.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to BMO Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCB.TO) at 0.91%. This indicates that FIG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZCB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIG.TO | ZCB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.53% | 0.91% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | 2.93% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.54% | 3.72% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.44% | 5.20% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.18% | 5.41% | +0.77% |
Dividends
FIG.TO vs. ZCB.TO - Dividend Comparison
FIG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than ZCB.TO's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIG.TO CI Investment Grade Bond ETF | 4.04% | 4.04% | 4.08% | 4.12% | 4.19% | 3.52% | 3.34% | 3.41% | 3.60% | 4.34% | 4.69% | 5.05% |
ZCB.TO BMO Corporate Bond Index ETF | 4.12% | 4.00% | 3.84% | 3.89% | 3.62% | 3.13% | 2.97% | 3.12% | 3.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIG.TO and ZCB.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI and BMO.
Find the right allocation for FIG.TO and ZCB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer