PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIG.TO vs. RQP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIG.TO vs. RQP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIG.TO) and RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (RQP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIG.TO achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than RQP.TO's 1.35% return.


FIG.TO

1D
0.21%
1M
0.13%
6M
1.19%
YTD
1.62%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
5.55%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
2.27%

RQP.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
6M
1.13%
YTD
1.35%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
5.70%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIG.TO vs. RQP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FIG.TO
CI Investment Grade Bond ETF
1.62%5.12%5.10%6.23%-12.53%-1.69%1.04%
RQP.TO
RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.35%4.15%6.22%6.87%-8.19%-2.20%1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FIG.TO and RQP.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020

0.48

The correlation between FIG.TO and RQP.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIG.TO vs. RQP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIG.TO
FIG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FIG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FIG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

RQP.TO
RQP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RQP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
RQP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIG.TO vs. RQP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIG.TO) and RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (RQP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIG.TORQP.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.64

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

5.07

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.65

26.61

-21.97

FIG.TO vs. RQP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the RQP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIG.TO and RQP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIG.TO vs. RQP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIG.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.80%, which is greater than RQP.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIG.TO and RQP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIG.TORQP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.80%

-13.88%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.27%

-0.65%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.24%

-1.46%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.97%

-12.93%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

0.00%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-4.13%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.12%

+0.82%

Volatility

FIG.TO vs. RQP.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIG.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (RQP.TO) at 0.28%. This indicates that FIG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RQP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIG.TORQP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

0.28%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

0.85%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.50%

1.15%

+3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.45%

3.85%

+1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.16%

3.77%

+2.39%

Dividends

FIG.TO vs. RQP.TO - Dividend Comparison

FIG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than RQP.TO's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIG.TO
CI Investment Grade Bond ETF
4.06%4.04%4.08%4.12%4.19%3.52%3.34%3.41%3.60%4.34%4.69%5.05%
RQP.TO
RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.70%3.58%3.25%3.18%2.67%2.29%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIG.TO and RQP.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: CI and RBC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIG.TO and RQP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer