PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIFZX vs. FMSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIFZX vs. FMSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Bond Index Fund (FIFZX) and Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIFZX achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than FMSFX's -0.01% return.


FIFZX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.22%
6M
-0.88%
YTD
-0.66%
1Y
1.78%
3Y*
3.68%
5Y*
-0.53%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.24%

FMSFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.11%
6M
-0.50%
YTD
-0.01%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
-0.13%
10Y*
1.12%
ALL TIME*
4.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIFZX vs. FMSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FIFZX
Fidelity Series Bond Index Fund
-0.66%7.15%1.41%5.54%-13.46%-1.96%7.65%5.12%
FMSFX
Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund
-0.01%8.29%1.00%4.91%-12.61%-1.20%4.41%4.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FIFZX and FMSFX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2019

0.89

The correlation between FIFZX and FMSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIFZX vs. FMSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIFZX
FIFZX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FIFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FIFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FMSFX
FMSFX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FMSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FMSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIFZX vs. FMSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Bond Index Fund (FIFZX) and Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIFZXFMSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.64

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.59

4.58

-1.99

FIFZX vs. FMSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIFZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the FMSFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIFZX and FMSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIFZX vs. FMSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIFZX drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, roughly equal to the maximum FMSFX drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIFZX and FMSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIFZXFMSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.27%

-18.81%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-2.81%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.11%

-6.97%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

-18.59%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.83%

-2.07%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.62%

-1.92%

-4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.01%

+0.16%

Volatility

FIFZX vs. FMSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Bond Index Fund (FIFZX) is 0.96%, while Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that FIFZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIFZXFMSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

1.08%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

3.03%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

3.89%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

6.82%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.59%

5.14%

+0.45%

FIFZX vs. FMSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIFZX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FMSFX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIFZX vs. FMSFX - Dividend Comparison

FIFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than FMSFX's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIFZX
Fidelity Series Bond Index Fund
3.74%3.87%3.66%3.09%1.74%1.42%3.20%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FMSFX
Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund
3.60%3.93%4.12%3.50%1.43%0.62%2.40%2.62%2.57%2.60%2.65%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FIFZX and FMSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FMSFX has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to FIFZX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIFZX dropped -19.27% vs FMSFX's -18.81%.

FMSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIFZX and FMSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer