FIFPX vs. GXXIX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FIFPX (Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class M) and GXXIX (abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FIFPX returned 12.35%/yr vs 11.77%/yr for GXXIX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIFPX charges 1.39%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for GXXIX.

Performance

FIFPX vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class M (FIFPX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIFPX achieves a 8.34% return, which is significantly higher than GXXIX's 7.09% return.

FIFPX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 2.91%
• YTD: 8.34%
• 6M: 8.76%
• 1Y: 20.87%
• 3Y*: 24.61%
• 5Y*: 12.35%
• 10Y*: —

GXXIX

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 3.79%
• YTD: 7.09%
• 6M: 5.90%
• 1Y: 11.84%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 11.77%
• 10Y*: 14.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIFPX vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FIFPX Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class M	8.34%	15.71%	35.82%	33.28%	-27.08%	18.45%	46.49%	13.46%
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund	7.09%	3.82%	10.11%	15.19%	-26.55%	81.37%	29.56%	20.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FIFPX and GXXIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019	0.88

The correlation between FIFPX and GXXIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIFPX vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIFPX

FIFPX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FIFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FIFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FIFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FIFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FIFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

GXXIX

GXXIX Risk / Return Rank: 15
GXXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
GXXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
GXXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
GXXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
GXXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIFPX vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class M (FIFPX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIFPX	GXXIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.08	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	1.59	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.19	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	1.09	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.21	4.20	+3.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIFPX vs. GXXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIFPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the GXXIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIFPX and GXXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIFPX	GXXIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	1.08	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.43	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.65	+0.13

Drawdowns

FIFPX vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIFPX drawdown since its inception was -32.82%, roughly equal to the maximum GXXIX drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIFPX and GXXIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIFPX	GXXIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.82%	-33.65%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.38%	-11.78%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	-19.74%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.82%	-33.65%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	0.00%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.15%	-6.16%	-1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	3.06%	-0.01%

Volatility

FIFPX vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class M (FIFPX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) at 3.02%. This indicates that FIFPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIFPX	GXXIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.73%	3.02%	+1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.40%	9.37%	+2.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.81%	11.93%	+2.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.19%	27.76%	-6.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.60%	23.72%	-1.12%

FIFPX vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIFPX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIFPX vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison

FIFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than GXXIX's 2.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIFPX Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class M	2.28%	2.47%	6.45%	0.00%	2.21%	5.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund	2.14%	2.30%	0.00%	0.28%	0.39%	59.39%	14.10%	9.76%	12.93%	10.11%	12.20%	5.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIFPX and GXXIX in my portfolio?

FIFPX and GXXIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIFPX or GXXIX?

FIFPX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to GXXIX (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIFPX dropped -32.82% vs GXXIX's -33.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.