PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIFGX vs. FFGCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIFGX vs. FFGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIFGX achieves a 32.95% return, which is significantly higher than FFGCX's 15.59% return.


FIFGX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-9.53%
YTD
32.95%
6M
30.30%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
141.87%
5Y*
74.86%
10Y*

FFGCX

1D
-1.85%
1M
-5.89%
YTD
15.59%
6M
15.74%
1Y
35.43%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIFGX vs. FFGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIFGX
Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused
32.95%7.44%6.34%781.04%9.30%32.92%1.48%9.32%-2.00%
FFGCX
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund
15.59%28.66%2.98%-5.18%20.69%26.08%6.04%17.82%0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FIFGX and FFGCX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2018

0.58

The correlation between FIFGX and FFGCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIFGX vs. FFGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIFGX
FIFGX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FIFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FIFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGCX
FFGCX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FFGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIFGX vs. FFGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIFGXFFGCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

3.98

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

14.72

-7.54

FIFGX vs. FFGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the FFGCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIFGX and FFGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIFGX vs. FFGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIFGX drawdown since its inception was -29.47%, smaller than the maximum FFGCX drawdown of -57.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIFGX and FFGCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIFGXFFGCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.47%

-57.23%

+27.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.91%

-8.73%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

-19.24%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.47%

-27.22%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.91%

-8.73%

-4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-19.32%

+11.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

2.36%

+1.71%

Volatility

FIFGX vs. FFGCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) have volatilities of 5.18% and 5.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIFGXFFGCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

5.35%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.68%

13.90%

+4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

17.00%

+4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

406.15%

21.39%

+384.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

331.81%

22.43%

+309.38%

FIFGX vs. FFGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIFGX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FFGCX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIFGX vs. FFGCX - Dividend Comparison

FIFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than FFGCX's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGCX
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund
2.19%2.53%2.62%2.01%1.84%3.39%1.61%2.98%2.22%0.36%1.53%2.86%
FIFGX
Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused
4.09%5.44%4.73%1.54%12.64%35.77%3.10%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIFGX and FFGCX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFGCX has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to FIFGX (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIFGX dropped -29.47% vs FFGCX's -57.23%.

FFGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIFGX and FFGCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer