PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIE.TO vs. ZCM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF (FIE.TO) and BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIE.TO achieves a 12.21% return, which is significantly higher than ZCM.TO's 2.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FIE.TO has outperformed ZCM.TO with an annualized return of 11.99%, while ZCM.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.02% annualized return.


FIE.TO

1D
0.64%
1M
5.26%
YTD
12.21%
6M
10.27%
1Y
31.71%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
11.99%

ZCM.TO

1D
0.06%
1M
2.44%
YTD
2.02%
6M
2.64%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
3.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIE.TO
iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF
12.21%24.36%27.62%12.58%-14.35%27.34%1.33%18.97%-9.12%12.01%
ZCM.TO
BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF
2.02%5.06%8.07%7.97%-10.18%-2.08%10.35%8.60%0.58%2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FIE.TO and ZCM.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2010

-0.05

The correlation between FIE.TO and ZCM.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIE.TO vs. ZCM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIE.TO
FIE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FIE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FIE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ZCM.TO
ZCM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ZCM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF (FIE.TO) and BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIE.TOZCM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.23

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

1.76

+2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.05

5.07

+8.98

FIE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is higher than the ZCM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIE.TO and ZCM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIE.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.24%, which is greater than ZCM.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIE.TO and ZCM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIE.TOZCM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.24%

-26.06%

-16.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

-3.08%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.70%

-4.02%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.93%

-15.81%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.24%

-26.06%

-16.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.31%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-2.60%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.07%

+1.14%

Volatility

FIE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF (FIE.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO) at 1.71%. This indicates that FIE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZCM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIE.TOZCM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

1.71%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

3.53%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.04%

4.52%

+4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.56%

6.10%

+4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

8.76%

+5.32%

FIE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIE.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCM.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Dividend Comparison

FIE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than ZCM.TO's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIE.TO
iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF
4.44%4.94%5.83%6.98%7.31%5.92%7.10%6.65%7.38%6.28%6.59%7.43%
ZCM.TO
BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF
4.25%4.03%3.85%3.94%3.81%3.30%3.13%3.34%3.23%3.04%3.18%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIE.TO and ZCM.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCM.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCM.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FIE.TO.

FIE.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while ZCM.TO is Corporate Bonds. FIE.TO tracks Morningstar Can Equity Tgt Alloc NR CAD, while ZCM.TO tracks FTSE Canada Mid Term Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FIE.TO and 0.33% for ZCM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIE.TO and ZCM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer