FIE.TO vs. QCN.TO
FIE.TO (iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF) and QCN.TO (Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - FIE.TO tracks the Morningstar Can Equity Tgt Alloc NR CAD while QCN.TO tracks the Solactive Canada Broad Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIE.TO returned 12.71%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for QCN.TO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIE.TO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for QCN.TO.
Performance
FIE.TO vs. QCN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIE.TO achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly lower than QCN.TO's 10.85% return.
FIE.TO
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 31.11%
- 3Y*
- 24.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
QCN.TO
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 35.02%
- 3Y*
- 23.88%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- —
FIE.TO vs. QCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIE.TO iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF | 8.54% | 28.28% | 27.54% | 12.58% | -14.35% | 29.02% | 1.33% | 18.97% | -10.76% |
QCN.TO Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF | 10.85% | 31.83% | 21.95% | 11.28% | -5.45% | 24.65% | 5.84% | 24.53% | -10.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIE.TO and QCN.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2018 | 0.58 |
The correlation between FIE.TO and QCN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.74 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FIE.TO vs. QCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FIE.TO
QCN.TO
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FIE.TO
QCN.TO
Real Estate
FIE.TO
QCN.TO
Basic Materials
FIE.TO
-
QCN.TO
Communication Services
FIE.TO
-
QCN.TO
Consumer Cyclical
FIE.TO
-
QCN.TO
Consumer Defensive
FIE.TO
-
QCN.TO
Energy
FIE.TO
-
QCN.TO
Healthcare
FIE.TO
-
QCN.TO
Industrials
FIE.TO
-
QCN.TO
Technology
FIE.TO
-
QCN.TO
Utilities
FIE.TO
-
QCN.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIE.TO vs. QCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FIE.TO
QCN.TO
FIE.TO vs. QCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF (FIE.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIE.TO | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 1.50 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.48 | 3.73 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.60 | 17.33 | +5.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIE.TO | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 2.75 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 1.15 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.82 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
FIE.TO vs. QCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIE.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.24%, which is greater than QCN.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIE.TO and QCN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIE.TO | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.24% | -36.90% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -9.43% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.70% | -12.26% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.93% | -16.30% | -6.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.97% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.87% | -3.65% | -1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 2.03% | -0.65% |
Volatility
FIE.TO vs. QCN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF (FIE.TO) is 2.87%, while Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that FIE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIE.TO | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 3.35% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 10.51% | -3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.37% | 12.80% | -4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 13.24% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 15.75% | -1.71% |
FIE.TO vs. QCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIE.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QCN.TO's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIE.TO vs. QCN.TO - Dividend Comparison
FIE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than QCN.TO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIE.TO iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF | 4.52% | 4.81% | 5.84% | 6.98% | 7.31% | 5.85% | 7.10% | 6.65% | 7.38% | 6.28% | 6.59% | 7.43% |
QCN.TO Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF | 1.96% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 3.37% | 3.26% | 2.45% | 3.02% | 3.07% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIE.TO and QCN.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QCN.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FIE.TO.
FIE.TO tracks Morningstar Can Equity Tgt Alloc NR CAD, while QCN.TO tracks Solactive Canada Broad Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FIE.TO and 0.04% for QCN.TO.
Find the right allocation for FIE.TO and QCN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer