FIE.TO vs. HXH.TO
FIE.TO (iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF) and HXH.TO (Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - FIE.TO tracks the Morningstar Can Equity Tgt Alloc NR CAD while HXH.TO tracks the Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FIE.TO returned 11.90%/yr vs 11.74%/yr for HXH.TO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIE.TO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for HXH.TO.
Performance
FIE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIE.TO achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly lower than HXH.TO's 20.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIE.TO having a 11.90% annualized return and HXH.TO not far behind at 11.74%.
FIE.TO
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 31.11%
- 3Y*
- 24.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
HXH.TO
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 40.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.85%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
FIE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIE.TO iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF | 8.54% | 28.28% | 27.54% | 12.58% | -14.35% | 29.02% | 1.33% | 18.97% | -9.12% | 12.01% |
HXH.TO Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF | 20.31% | 25.86% | 15.24% | 6.33% | 5.00% | 34.51% | -7.66% | 22.17% | -14.86% | 8.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIE.TO and HXH.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2016 | 0.55 |
The correlation between FIE.TO and HXH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FIE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FIE.TO
HXH.TO
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FIE.TO
HXH.TO
-
Real Estate
FIE.TO
HXH.TO
Basic Materials
FIE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Communication Services
FIE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
FIE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
FIE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Energy
FIE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Healthcare
FIE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Industrials
FIE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Technology
FIE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Utilities
FIE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIE.TO vs. HXH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FIE.TO
HXH.TO
FIE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF (FIE.TO) and Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIE.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 2.08 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.48 | 16.25 | -10.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.60 | 50.77 | -28.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIE.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 4.99 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 1.33 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.74 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
FIE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIE.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.24%, roughly equal to the maximum HXH.TO drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIE.TO and HXH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIE.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.24% | -40.80% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -2.52% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.70% | -10.55% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.93% | -15.88% | -7.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.24% | -40.80% | -1.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.73% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.87% | -4.86% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 0.81% | +0.57% |
Volatility
FIE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF (FIE.TO) and Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO) have volatilities of 2.87% and 3.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIE.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 3.02% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 6.79% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.37% | 8.23% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 12.18% | -1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 16.05% | -2.01% |
FIE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIE.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HXH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Dividend Comparison
FIE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, while HXH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIE.TO iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF | 4.52% | 4.81% | 5.84% | 6.98% | 7.31% | 5.85% | 7.10% | 6.65% | 7.38% | 6.28% | 6.59% | 7.43% |
HXH.TO Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIE.TO and HXH.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FIE.TO.
FIE.TO tracks Morningstar Can Equity Tgt Alloc NR CAD, while HXH.TO tracks Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FIE.TO and 0.11% for HXH.TO.
Find the right allocation for FIE.TO and HXH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer