FIDPX vs. FSGEX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIDPX (Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio) and FSGEX (Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FIDPX returned 7.35%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for FSGEX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIDPX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FSGEX.

Performance

FIDPX vs. FSGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio (FIDPX) and Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDPX achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly lower than FSGEX's 15.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDPX has underperformed FSGEX with an annualized return of 7.35%, while FSGEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.

FIDPX

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.24%
• YTD: 2.10%
• 6M: 4.43%
• 1Y: 9.78%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: 8.19%
• 10Y*: 7.35%

FSGEX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 15.85%
• 6M: 18.73%
• 1Y: 33.95%
• 3Y*: 20.16%
• 5Y*: 9.06%
• 10Y*: 9.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDPX vs. FSGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIDPX Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio	2.10%	34.77%	-2.40%	15.20%	-3.10%	6.20%	6.81%	22.76%	-9.16%	13.54%
FSGEX Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund	15.85%	32.99%	5.34%	15.56%	-15.75%	7.77%	10.75%	21.41%	-13.99%	27.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDPX and FSGEX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2015	0.76

The correlation between FIDPX and FSGEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FIDPX vs. FSGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDPX

FIDPX Risk / Return Rank: 8
FIDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FIDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FIDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FIDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FIDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

FSGEX

FSGEX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FSGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FSGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FSGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FSGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FSGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDPX vs. FSGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio (FIDPX) and Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIDPX	FSGEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	2.31	-1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	3.13	-2.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.43	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	2.98	-2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.26	11.69	-9.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIDPX vs. FSGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the FSGEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDPX and FSGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIDPX	FSGEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	2.31	-1.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.59	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.62	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.42	-0.04

Drawdowns

FIDPX vs. FSGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDPX drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, smaller than the maximum FSGEX drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDPX and FSGEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIDPX	FSGEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.28%	-34.74%	+3.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.25%	-11.24%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.96%	-13.34%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.25%	-29.66%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.28%	-34.74%	+3.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.18%	0.00%	-9.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.35%	-8.45%	+2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	2.86%	+0.97%

Volatility

FIDPX vs. FSGEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio (FIDPX) is 4.47%, while Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that FIDPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIDPX	FSGEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	4.95%	-0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.36%	12.28%	-1.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.55%	14.56%	-2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.25%	15.40%	-1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.05%	16.22%	-1.17%

FIDPX vs. FSGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSGEX's 0.01% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FIDPX vs. FSGEX - Dividend Comparison

FIDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than FSGEX's 2.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIDPX Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio	4.90%	3.48%	5.12%	4.47%	4.38%	4.54%	3.91%	4.32%	5.23%	4.63%	4.65%	3.92%
FSGEX Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund	2.61%	3.02%	2.98%	2.90%	2.78%	2.59%	1.68%	2.10%	2.86%	2.48%	2.56%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIDPX and FSGEX in my portfolio?

FIDPX and FSGEX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIDPX or FSGEX?

FSGEX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to FIDPX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDPX dropped -31.28% vs FSGEX's -34.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.