PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICSX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FICSX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class C (FICSX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICSX achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FICSX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 7.84%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.


FICSX

1D
-0.39%
1M
3.33%
YTD
9.70%
6M
11.56%
1Y
17.70%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
7.84%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICSX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FICSX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class C
9.70%23.45%-1.00%18.40%-17.50%12.27%8.81%20.21%-16.98%30.98%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FICSX and FCNTX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.63

The correlation between FICSX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

FICSX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FICSX
FCNTX

Industrials

22.9%
8.6%

Financial Services

15.5%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
3.7%

Technology

10.0%
27.0%

Basic Materials

8.3%
2.1%

Healthcare

7.5%
9.2%

Real Estate

5.5%
0.1%

Communication Services

4.0%
21.2%

Energy

3.5%
3.6%

Utilities

1.1%
0.5%

Industrials

FICSX
22.9%
FCNTX
8.6%

Financial Services

FICSX
15.5%
FCNTX
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FICSX
11.7%
FCNTX
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

FICSX
10.1%
FCNTX
3.7%

Technology

FICSX
10.0%
FCNTX
27.0%

Basic Materials

FICSX
8.3%
FCNTX
2.1%

Healthcare

FICSX
7.5%
FCNTX
9.2%

Real Estate

FICSX
5.5%
FCNTX
0.1%

Communication Services

FICSX
4.0%
FCNTX
21.2%

Energy

FICSX
3.5%
FCNTX
3.6%

Utilities

FICSX
1.1%
FCNTX
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICSX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICSX
FICSX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FICSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FICSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICSX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class C (FICSX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FICSXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

2.13

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.72

9.04

-3.32

FICSX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICSX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FICSXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.72

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.79

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.89

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.78

-0.10

Drawdowns

FICSX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICSX drawdown since its inception was -61.39%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICSX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICSXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.39%

-49.19%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-11.30%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-19.75%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.79%

-32.59%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.18%

-32.59%

-7.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.53%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.39%

-8.16%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.65%

+0.38%

Volatility

FICSX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class C (FICSX) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FICSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICSXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

3.26%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

10.48%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.25%

14.03%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.58%

19.15%

-5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.06%

19.68%

-5.62%

FICSX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICSX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FICSX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FICSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FICSX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class C
2.49%2.73%1.59%0.97%0.00%6.57%0.00%1.20%5.20%2.59%1.66%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


FICSX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FICSX has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICSX dropped -61.39% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICSX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer