FICS vs. NFTY
FICS (First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FICS is a Global Equities fund tracking the The International Developed Capital Strength Index, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FICS returned 4.92%/yr vs 4.62%/yr for NFTY. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FICS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
FICS vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FICS achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return.
FICS
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 3.51%
- 1Y
- 3.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- —
NFTY
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- -9.70%
- 6M
- -7.99%
- 1Y
- -8.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
FICS vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICS First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF | 0.83% | 20.44% | 2.59% | 18.07% | -19.47% | 19.78% | 2.20% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -9.70% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 24.00% | -3.46% | 26.83% | 1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FICS and NFTY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2020 | 0.45 |
FICS vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FICS
NFTY
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FICS
NFTY
Industrials
FICS
NFTY
Consumer Defensive
FICS
NFTY
Consumer Cyclical
FICS
NFTY
Healthcare
FICS
NFTY
Communication Services
FICS
NFTY
Basic Materials
FICS
NFTY
Energy
FICS
NFTY
Technology
FICS
NFTY
Real Estate
FICS
-
NFTY
-
Utilities
FICS
-
NFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FICS vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
FICS
NFTY
FICS vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FICS | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.91 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | -0.53 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.97 | -1.39 | +2.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FICS | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | -0.58 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.27 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.28 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
FICS vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FICS drawdown since its inception was -29.16%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICS and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FICS | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.16% | -47.67% | +18.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -16.14% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.66% | -21.55% | +9.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.16% | -21.55% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.79% | -17.45% | +12.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | -9.58% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 6.12% | -2.52% |
Volatility
FICS vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) have volatilities of 4.53% and 4.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FICS | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 4.58% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 12.57% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.26% | 14.72% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 17.39% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 20.72% | -3.78% |
FICS vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FICS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FICS vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
FICS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, which matches NFTY's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICS First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF | 1.96% | 1.85% | 2.01% | 1.02% | 1.89% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.96% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FICS and NFTY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFTY has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to FICS (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICS dropped -29.16% vs NFTY's -47.67%.
On 5-year performance, FICS leads with 4.92% vs 4.62% for NFTY. On fees, FICS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FICS has performed better with a 4.92% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FICS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.
FICS and NFTY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.96%.
FICS is categorized as Global Equities, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. FICS tracks The International Developed Capital Strength Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FICS and 0.80% for NFTY.
FICS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FICS and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer