FICS vs. FTXL
FICS (First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FICS is a Global Equities fund tracking the The International Developed Capital Strength Index, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FICS returned 5.38%/yr vs 33.38%/yr for FTXL. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FICS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
FICS vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FICS achieves a 3.64% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 111.02% return.
FICS
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 3.64%
- 6M
- 3.31%
- 1Y
- 7.77%
- 3Y*
- 10.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- -7.99%
- 1M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 111.02%
- 6M
- 108.37%
- 1Y
- 198.66%
- 3Y*
- 59.97%
- 5Y*
- 33.38%
- 10Y*
- —
FICS vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICS First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF | 3.64% | 20.44% | 2.59% | 18.07% | -19.47% | 19.78% | 2.47% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 111.02% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 36.04% | 1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between FICS and FTXL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2020 | 0.47 |
The correlation between FICS and FTXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FICS vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FICS
FTXL
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FICS
FTXL
-
Industrials
FICS
FTXL
Consumer Defensive
FICS
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
FICS
FTXL
-
Healthcare
FICS
FTXL
-
Basic Materials
FICS
FTXL
-
Communication Services
FICS
FTXL
-
Energy
FICS
FTXL
-
Technology
FICS
FTXL
Real Estate
FICS
-
FTXL
-
Utilities
FICS
-
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FICS vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
FICS
FTXL
FICS vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FICS | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.63 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 13.78 | -13.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 47.69 | -45.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FICS vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FICS drawdown since its inception was -29.16%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICS and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FICS | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.16% | -43.87% | +14.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -14.51% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.66% | -41.57% | +29.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.16% | -43.87% | +14.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -7.99% | +5.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.16% | -10.53% | +3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 4.18% | -0.56% |
Volatility
FICS vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) is 3.37%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 22.71%. This indicates that FICS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FICS | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 22.71% | -19.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.92% | 34.66% | -23.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 40.91% | -27.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 37.11% | -19.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 34.77% | -17.88% |
FICS vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FICS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FICS vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
FICS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than FTXL's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICS First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF | 1.91% | 1.85% | 2.01% | 1.02% | 1.89% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FICS and FTXL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (22.71%) compared to FICS (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICS dropped -29.16% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 33.38% vs 5.38% for FICS. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FICS has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 33.38% return vs 5.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FICS.
FICS has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.13% for FTXL.
FICS is categorized as Global Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. FICS tracks The International Developed Capital Strength Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FICS and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.89 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FICS and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer