PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICS vs. BOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FICS vs. BOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICS achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than BOAT's 44.44% return.


FICS

1D
0.85%
1M
1.41%
6M
7.33%
YTD
8.72%
1Y
14.35%
3Y*
12.86%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.31%

BOAT

1D
-0.44%
1M
12.97%
6M
26.12%
YTD
44.44%
1Y
56.33%
3Y*
26.76%
5Y*
24.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.71M$1.08M$1.05M
$518.34K$465.94K$910.86K

FICS vs. BOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FICS
First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF
8.72%20.44%2.59%18.07%-19.47%2.48%
BOAT
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF
44.44%22.77%5.97%24.53%6.26%21.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FICS and BOAT is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021

0.40

FICS vs. BOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FICS
BOAT

Financial Services

29.0%
6.6%

Industrials

27.7%
29.2%

Consumer Defensive

13.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%

-

Healthcare

9.6%

-

Basic Materials

4.1%

-

Communication Services

3.6%

-

Energy

3.1%
10.3%

Technology

1.7%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FICS
29.0%
BOAT
6.6%

Industrials

FICS
27.7%
BOAT
29.2%

Consumer Defensive

FICS
13.8%
BOAT

-

Consumer Cyclical

FICS
10.5%
BOAT

-

Healthcare

FICS
9.6%
BOAT

-

Basic Materials

FICS
4.1%
BOAT

-

Communication Services

FICS
3.6%
BOAT

-

Energy

FICS
3.1%
BOAT
10.3%

Technology

FICS
1.7%
BOAT

-

Real Estate

FICS

-

BOAT

-

Utilities

FICS

-

BOAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICS vs. BOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FICS
FICS Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FICS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FICS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

BOAT
BOAT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FICS vs. BOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FICSBOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.44

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

4.88

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

13.77

-9.12

FICS vs. BOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICS Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the BOAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICS and BOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FICS vs. BOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICS drawdown since its inception was -29.16%, smaller than the maximum BOAT drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICS and BOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICSBOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.16%

-33.94%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-11.60%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.14%

-33.94%

+22.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.16%

-33.94%

+4.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.97%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-9.50%

+2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

4.10%

-1.00%

Volatility

FICS vs. BOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) is 3.67%, while SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that FICS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICSBOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

6.47%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

16.87%

-5.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.20%

20.69%

-7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

25.05%

-7.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

25.05%

-8.24%

FICS vs. BOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BOAT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FICS vs. BOAT - Dividend Comparison

FICS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than BOAT's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BOAT
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF
6.37%8.08%13.89%13.65%13.57%1.36%
FICS
First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF
1.78%1.85%2.01%1.02%1.89%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


FICS and BOAT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOAT has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to FICS (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICS dropped -29.16% vs BOAT's -33.94%.

On 5-year performance, BOAT leads with 24.35% vs 5.38% for FICS. On fees, BOAT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, FICS has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BOAT has performed better with a 24.35% return vs 5.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOAT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FICS.

BOAT has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 1.78% for FICS.

FICS is categorized as Global Equities, while BOAT is Industrials Equities. FICS tracks The International Developed Capital Strength Index, while BOAT tracks Solactive Global Shipping Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FICS and 0.69% for BOAT.

BOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICS and BOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer